· Private foundation
Snyder H C & M a Tw Char Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of SNYDER H C & M A TW CHAR TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC | $9,500 |
| CHURCH OF THE HOLY TRINITY | $4,600 |
| PHOENIX VOLUNTEER FIRE CO | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| AMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS | $3,000 |
| CENTRAL PA HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,300 |
| HOLLIDAYSBURG LIBRARY | $2,300 |
| BLAIR REGIONAL YMCA | $2,300 |
| GLORIA GATES FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SD FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA | $1,250 |
| ROARING SPRING COMMUNITY LIBRARY | $1,200 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| LOGAN TWP UNITED FIRE DEPT | $1,000 |
| GEESEYTOWN COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY5× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +19%
- PVPhoenix Volunteer Fire Co #19× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +58%
- FFFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- FFFRIENDSHIP FIRE COMPANYone grant, 2024 · $800
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $500
- JHJOSHUA HOUSE INCone grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.
Promote fire safety and provide fire protection.
To provide fire and rescue services to lower alsace township and surrounding communities
Providing emergency, safety and fire services to lawrence park township pennsylvania.
Provides fire rescue and ems to the areas of greenwood, bellmeade, and all of northeast logan township
Provide fire protection for the residents of the village and town of fort ann.
Volunteer firefighting and emergency services
Volunteer fire company
Volunteer fire fighting
Provide fire fighting in the local area by volunteers, provide emergency responders to medical emergencies and accidents, and provide fire prevention education to the community
Providing public fire protection and emergency rescue services.
Volunteer fire company
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakemont Volunteer Fire Company and the most unlike its peers is Bellwood-Antis Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co #1 ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds ALTOONA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GEESEYTOWN COMMUNITY FIRE CO ↗
- Who funds LAKEMONT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ROARING SPRING COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PINECROFT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE CO ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds DAY ONE OF GREATER ALTOONA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bruno & Lena Degol Family Found · Central Pennsylvania Community Foundation · Ward Foundation · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Snyder H C & M a Tw Char Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.