Skip to content

· Private foundation

Snyder H C & M a Tw Char Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$88kFood & Nutrition$85kAnimals$53kReligion$51kEducation$48kHuman Services$47kYouth Development$16kCommunity Improvement$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$877k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC$9,500
CHURCH OF THE HOLY TRINITY$4,600
PHOENIX VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
AMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS$3,000
HOLLIDAYSBURG LIBRARY$2,300
BLAIR REGIONAL YMCA$2,300
CENTRAL PA HUMANE SOCIETY$2,300
HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SD FOUNDATION$2,000
GLORIA GATES FOUNDATION$2,000
YOUNG LIFE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA$1,250
ROARING SPRING COMMUNITY LIBRARY$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$1,000
CLAYSBURG VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%Arc of blair county: $700 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$450k · 45 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
9

Total granted

$450k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +19%
  • PV
    Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co #1
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +58%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRIENDSHIP FIRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2024 · $800
  • BP
    BELLWOOD-ANTIS PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue -5%
  • KC
    KID CAREERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—
2
Hartsville Volunteer Fire Co 1

Promote fire safety and provide fire protection.

—
3
Community Volunteer Fire Co Lower Alsace

To provide fire and rescue services to lower alsace township and surrounding communities

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Lawrence Park Volunteer Fire Department

Providing emergency, safety and fire services to lawrence park township pennsylvania.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Greenwood Volunteer Fire Company

Provides fire rescue and ems to the areas of greenwood, bellmeade, and all of northeast logan township

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Fort Ann Volunteer Fire Companyinc

Provide fire protection for the residents of the village and town of fort ann.

—
7
Penn Forest Township Volunteer Fire Co No 1

Volunteer firefighting and emergency services

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Penryn Fire Company 1 Inc

Volunteer fire company

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Hereford Volunteer Fire Company Inc

Volunteer fire fighting

Health
10
Pottsgrove Fire Company

Provide fire fighting in the local area by volunteers, provide emergency responders to medical emergencies and accidents, and provide fire prevention education to the community

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Grandview Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Providing public fire protection and emergency rescue services.

—
12
Reliance Fire Co No 1 of Berwick Pennsylvania

Volunteer fire company

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakemont Volunteer Fire Company; the most unlike its peers is Bellwood-Antis Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC (SVDP): $48,000 · OtherFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC (SVDP)CENTRAL PA HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,775 · OtherCENTRAL PA HUMANE SOCIETYHOLY TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25,200 · OtherHOLY TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $22,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS INC: $19,000 · OtherAMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS INCGLORIA GATES FOUNDATION: $17,400 · OtherALTOONA FOOD BANK: $17,250 · OtherRESCUE MISSION: $17,100 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HOLY: $15,650 · OtherBLAIR REGIONAL YMCA: $13,100 · Other+34 more: $133,919 · Other+34 morePhoenix Volunteer Fire Co #1: $19,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPhoenix Vol…GEESEYTOWN COMMUNITY FIRE CO: $9,500 · Public Safety & DisasterGEESEYTOWN …LAKEMONT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $8,750 · Public Safety & DisasterLAKEMONT VO…PINECROFT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $3,800 · Public Safety & DisasterPINECROFT V…FREEDOM TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE CO: $3,700 · Public Safety & DisasterFREEDOM TOW…HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $25,800 · EducationROARING SPRING COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $3,900 · EducationFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC: $19,000 · Food & NutritionYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentDAY ONE OF GREATER ALTOONA: $1,500 · HealthTHE ARC OF BLAIR COUNTY: $1,500 · Human Services
Other$354,794Public Safety & Disaster$44,750Education$29,700Food & Nutrition$19,000Youth Development$3,000Health$1,500Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $25,800 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetPhoenix Volunteer Fire Co #1: $19,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC: $19,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALTOONA FOOD BANK: $17,250 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGEESEYTOWN COMMUNITY FIRE CO: $9,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetLAKEMONT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $8,750 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetROARING SPRING COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $3,900 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPINECROFT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $3,800 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFREEDOM TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE CO: $3,700 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAY ONE OF GREATER ALTOONA: $1,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF BLAIR COUNTY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALTOONA COMMUNITY THEATRE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBELLWOOD-ANTIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOSHUA HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co #1 ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTOONA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GEESEYTOWN COMMUNITY FIRE CO ↗
  • Who funds LAKEMONT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds ROARING SPRING COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PINECROFT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE CO ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds DAY ONE OF GREATER ALTOONA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bruno & Lena Degol Family FoundPA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bruno & Lena Degol Family Found · Central Pennsylvania Community Foundation · Ward Foundation · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Snyder H C & M a Tw Char Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Snyder H C & M a Tw Char Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Snyder H C & M a Tw Char’s filings →

    More from the funding graph