Skip to content

· Private foundation

Snider Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$205kFood & Nutrition$36kAnimals$24kEnvironment$24kHuman Services$23kYouth Development$21kInternational$13kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$955k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIDMC$70,000
DANA FARBER CANCER$10,000
AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATER$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$4,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$3,000
FJECC$3,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$3,000
TENACITY$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE$2,000
PROJECT BREAD$2,000
HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$2,000
HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS$2,000
MSPCA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $4k → 16%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $4k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $4k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $4k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $4k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3k → 14%AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATER: $5k → 8%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $4k → 16%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $4k → 16%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $4k → 16%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%BIDMC: $70k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER: $15k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER: $15k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER: $15k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER: $15k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER: $10k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER: $10k → 16%FJECC: $3k → 16%PROJECT BREAD: $4k → 16%PROJECT BREAD: $4k → 16%PROJECT BREAD: $3k → 16%PROJECT BREAD: $3k → 16%PROJECT BREAD: $3k → 16%THE MSPCA-ANGELL: $4k → 16%ANGELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $4k → 16%ANGELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $4k → 16%MSPCA: $4k → 16%MSPCA: $4k → 16%ARNOLD ARBORETUM: $3k → 16%ARNOLD ARBORETUM: $3k → 16%ARNOLD ARBORETUM: $3k → 16%TENACITY: $4k → 16%TENACITY: $4k → 16%TENACITY: $4k → 16%TENACITY: $4k → 16%TENACITY: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 16 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$304k
$2k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +95%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +78%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITIES
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
3
Winchester Hospital

The mission of winchester hospital is "to care. to heal. to excel." this ethos provides each and every staff member with clear expectations, promoting teamwork and respect while ensuring safety, quality and empathy for patients. winchester…

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
9
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…

Health
10
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
11
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of patients. nebh strives to…

Health
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Bread-the Walk for Hunger Inc; the most unlike its peers is Warner Home for Little Wanderers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $80,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INC: $70,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,300 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCHARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $22,000 · OtherHARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTHIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $17,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCWARNER HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $14,500 · OtherWARNER HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERSPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE: $12,000 · OtherPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THENORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $10,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INCANGELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $8,000 · OtherANGELL MEMORIAL HOSPITALTHE SALVATION ARMY: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $7,000 · Other+3 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $23,500 · EnvironmentTENACITY INC: $20,500 · Recreation & SportsPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $19,000 · Food & NutritionMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $14,000 · AnimalsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 · InternationalAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$175,300Other$113,500Environment$23,500Recreation & Sports$20,500Food & Nutrition$19,000Animals$14,000International$13,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTENACITY INC: $20,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWARNER HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $14,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TENACITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WARNER HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Snider Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Snider Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • American Repertory Theatre Co Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Snider Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Snider Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Snider Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph