Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Snapp Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$93kEducation$85kPublic Benefit$27kRecreation & Sports$20kCivil Rights$19kHealth$14kInternational$7kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$614k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHBISHOP MITTY HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
SAINT MARTIN OF TOURS$15,000
NAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$2,000
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$2,000
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$2,000
PROVIDENCE OF ST JOSEPH$1,000
ANGELA HOSPICE$1,000
JUDITIAL WATCH$1,000
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR GUN RIGHTS$1,000
SUNNYVALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM$1,000
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$1,000
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN JOSE: $1k → 8%ANGELA HOSPICE: $1k → 21%ANGELA HOSPICE: $1k → 21%ANGELA HOSPICE: $1k → 21%ANGELA HOSPICE: $500 → 21%ANGELA HOSPICE: $500 → 21%ANGELA HOSPICE: $500 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Snapp Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 55% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 47% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Snapp Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$235k · 31 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
12

Total granted

$235k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-4%

Still filing today

39%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitCivil RightsEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +25%
  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • DM
    DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL WATER POLO FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • AV
    ADA VIA ST MARTIN OF TOURS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

3
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

6
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

7
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
10
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
11
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for Gun Rights Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Education Equity LeadershipVeteran Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%55%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAINT MARTIN OF TOURS — $87,350 · OtherSAINT MARTIN OF TOURSUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL AND ACADEMY — $22,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL AND ACADEMYARCHBISHOP MITTY HIGH SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP MITTY HIGH SCHOOLNAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · OtherNAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY — $17,500 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORYYoung America's Foundation — $9,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC — $9,000 · Other+27 more — $40,512 · Other+27 moreTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $7,100 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute — $4,250 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $4,000 · Public BenefitJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $11,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $9,750 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,250 · EducationANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $1,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC — $4,250 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $1,500 · Civil RightsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,050 · International
Other$225,862Public Benefit$15,350Arts & Culture$11,100Education$11,000Human Services$9,500Civil Rights$5,750International$1,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $9,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $7,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC — $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC — $4,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC
  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH14.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Snapp Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph