Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2026still arriving
27
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$508kYouth Development$241kPhilanthropy$157kHealth$129kReligion$70kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$32kCommunity Improvement$29kOther$0
02FY2026 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k15 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $180k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$30,000
FRONT STREET UNITED METHODIST CHUR$20,000
ALAMANCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE LAMB'S CHAPEL$20,000
ALAMANCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE BURLINGTON SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
J HAROLD SMITH CAROLINA SCHOLARS FU$10,000
VIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$10,000
GREENSBORO DAY SCHOOL$10,000
NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
OLD NORTH STATE COUNCIL$10,000
ALAMANCE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI$7,500
UNCG - ALYSE S COOPER$7,500
METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 8%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 8%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 8%ABC OF NC: $3k → 15%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 8%ABC OF NC: $3k → 15%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 8%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 8%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 8%THE BARNABAS NETWORK: $5k → 16%RALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC: $3k → 13%RALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC: $3k → 13%RALPH SCOTT LIFE SERVICES: $3k → 13%RALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC: $3k → 13%RALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 49 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2026, 32 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+30%

Still filing today

55%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $248k · revenue +128%
  • AC
    Alamance Community College Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $63k · revenue +3%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHONA SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +134%
  • JT
    JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
2
North Carolina State University College of Sciences Foundation Inc

Provide financial support for all types of education and research within the college of sciences at north carolina state university.

Philanthropy
3
North Carolina Biotechnology Center

The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…

Science & Tech
4
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
7
North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law
Crime & Legal
8
North Greenville University

North greenville university exists to glorify god by cultivating graduates who are equipped to serve as transformational leaders for church and society.

Education
9
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
10
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
11
Wofford College

The purpose of wofford college is to function as a liberal arts institution of superior quality. its chief concern is the development of an intellectual, spiritual, and aesthetic atmosphere in which serious and inquiring minds of students…

—
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Socionomics Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $247,500 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $79,333 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $75,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAAlamance Community College Foundation: $62,500 · OtherAlamance Community College FoundationVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherNC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherFRONT STREET UNITED METHODICT CHURC: $45,500 · OtherLAMBS CHAPEL INC: $43,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,500 · Other+37 more: $343,500 · Other+37 moreALAMANCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $83,833 · PhilanthropyALAMANCE COMM…J HAROLD SMITH CAROLINA SCHOLARS: $55,000 · PhilanthropyJ HAROLD SMIT…UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18,500 · PhilanthropyNORTH CAROLIN…UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $40,176 · EducationUNC HEALTH …Greensboro Independent School Corp: $27,500 · EducationGreensboro …University of Arizona Foundation: $27,000 · EducationUniversity …WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST…WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationWOODBERRY F…THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $15,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SC…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVER…Greensboro College: $7,500 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGE: $7,500 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationOld North State Council Inc: $72,500 · Youth DevelopmentSWINGPALS INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Methodist Home for Children Inc: $34,000 · Human ServicesRALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesALAMANCE ELDERCARE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesABC OF NC CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE BARNABAS NETWORK: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $24,259 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 · HealthJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthGREENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH CAROLINA FOLK FESTIVAL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER: $5,000 · Arts & CultureETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,042,333Philanthropy$207,333Education$178,176Youth Development$120,000Human Services$66,500Health$41,759Arts & Culture$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $247,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALAMANCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $83,833 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOld North State Council Inc: $72,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAlamance Community College Foundation: $62,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetJ HAROLD SMITH CAROLINA SCHOLARS: $55,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $40,176 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Methodist Home for Children Inc: $34,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSWINGPALS INC: $30,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGreensboro Independent School Corp: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $24,259 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LEAF SOCIETY: $20,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIONOMICS FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 97% of budgetPOSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPET ADOPTION AND WELFARE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetALAMANCE ELDERCARE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetABC OF NC CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARNABAS NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURLINGTON DOWNTOWN CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetREACH OUT FIRST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMANCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Old North State Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alamance Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds J HAROLD SMITH CAROLINA SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Methodist Home for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds SWINGPALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Greensboro Independent School Corp ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LEAF SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIONOMICS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RALPH SCOTT LIFESERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PET ADOPTION AND WELFARE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC22.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Ernest a Koury Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Allendale Fund · Vicky and Sam Hunt Foundation · Well-Spring Retirement Community Inc · Hagan Family Fund · The Joseph M Bryan Foundation · The Cemala Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Smith Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph