Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith & Watson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$64kYouth Development$43kHealth$40kArts & Culture$29kHousing & Shelter$22kReligion$11kFood & Nutrition$8kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$599k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST$6,000
PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM$5,000
GRANBURY CHURCH OF CHRIST$5,000
MY POWER INC$4,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,000
NEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
SOUTHWEST SYMPHONY$1,500
WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM$1,000
LEA COUNTY MUSEUM$750
ISAIAHS SOUP KITCHEN$750
LEA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$500
CONQUISTADOR BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $750 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $500 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $500 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $500 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $500 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $500 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $400 → 19%LEADERS INDUSTRIES: $400 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 16 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$229k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+8%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MYPOWER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +46%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +38%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +290%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -52%
  • SC
    SACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +8%
  • TS
    TAYLOR ST CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern New Mexico Educational Foundation Inc

To provide leadership, build partnerships and enable the innovation necessary to reestablish local food and energy production, strengthen educational systems and establish placemaking in our communities while promoting northeastern new…

Arts & Culture
2
New Mexico Inter-Faith Community Housing

New mexico interfaith housing pursues its charitable purpose through the development, production, and management of high quality affordable housing in stable communities. to provide supportive services at no cost to residents for…

Housing & Shelter
3
Sierra Health Care Inc

To deliver the highest quality care to sustain the health and well-being of every patient through the variety of healthcare services we provide.

Health
4
Mesilla Valley Habitat for Humanity

We are the mesilla valley habitat for humanity (an affiliate of habitat for humanity international), serving the greater las cruces are in dona ana county, new mexico. we have given a hand up (rather than a hand out) to 88 new home owners…

Housing & Shelter
5
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
6
New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc

The mission of the new mexico rural electric cooperatives (nmrec) is to advance protect and advocate member interests.

—
7
New Mexico Oil & Gas Association

To promote the safe and responsible development of oil and gas resources in new mexico through advocacy, collaboration, and education.

—
8
Economic Council Helping Others Inc

Administer grants from various sources for the purpose of identifying, assisting, and eliminating the causes of poverty within northern new mexico.

Human Services
9
Newton Housing Development Corporation

Increase the quantity and quality of housing in newton, iowa

Housing & Shelter
10
Southwest Creations Collaborative

The mission of southwest creations collaborative is to create dignified living wage jobs for women in new mexico through a sustainable manufacturing social enterprise that engages its employees, customers and the community in building…

Employment
11
Center for Environmental Health Monitoring and Management

To promote excellence in national and international environmental management. the center supports initiatives in protection of human health and the environment while advancing economic development through applied technology.

Science & Tech
12
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Albuquerque Habitat for Humanity; the most unlike its peers is New Horizons Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM: $35,500 · OtherPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAMNEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $12,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC: $9,500 · OtherENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INCIndividual grant recipient: $7,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $6,000 · OtherWESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUMGRANBURY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $6,800 · Other+5 moreMYPOWER INC: $41,500 · Human ServicesMYPOWER INCLEADERS INDUSTRIES INC: $4,050 · Human ServicesLEADERS INDUSTRIES IN…UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $39,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE …GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER AL…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FO…LEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC: $9,750 · Arts & CultureISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN: $8,250 · ReligionSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $1,000 · ReligionLEA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,500 · AnimalsNEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$107,500Human Services$45,550Education$39,000Housing & Shelter$21,500Arts & Culture$9,750Religion$9,250Animals$4,500Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMYPOWER INC: $41,500 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $39,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC: $9,750 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC: $9,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN: $8,250 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetLEA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM: $4,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLEADERS INDUSTRIES INC: $4,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MYPOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds LEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds LEA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM ↗
  • Who funds LEADERS INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

JF Maddox FoundationNM26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: JF Maddox Foundation · The Veteto Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith & Watson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith & Watson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Smith & Watson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Smith & Watson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smith & Watson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph