Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sla Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$685kHealth$167kFood & Nutrition$60kReligion$50kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $129k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE JOYCE THEATER$15,000
MANHATTAN THEATER$12,500
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$11,500
CITY HARVEST$10,000
FOODBANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$10,000
NEW YORK CITY CENTER$10,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$10,000
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR STEM CELL RESEARCH$10,000
AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR THE BLIND$10,000
LINCOLN CENTER$10,000
THE PLAY COMPANY$5,000
CHEVRA HATZALAH$5,000
PROSPECTOR THEATER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $12k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$900k · 22 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$900k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+50%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $98k · revenue +35%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +16%
  • TS
    THE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATER CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • AA
    ALVIN AILEY DANCE STUDIO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami New Drama

Miami new drama is a nonprofit professional theater company based in miami beach, florida, dedicated to the development and production of new theatrical work and to theater-making as a means of social engagement, cultural conversation, and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
3
New York City Ballet Inc

Perform, promote and sustain classical ballet.

Arts & Culture
4
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
New York Shakespeare Festival

As the nation's foremost producer of shakespeare and new work, the public theater is dedicated to achieving artistic excellence while developing an american theater that is accessible and relevant to all people through productions of…

Arts & Culture
7
The New Group Inc

The new group is an artist-driven company with a commitment to developing and producing powerful, contemporary theater. while constantly evolving, we maintain an ensemble approach to all our work and an articulated style of emotional…

Arts & Culture
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
10
Berkeley Repertory Theatre

Please see schedule o for the complete mission statement.berkeley repertory theatre creates ambitious theatre that entertains and challenges its audiences, provokes civic engagement, and inspires people to experience the world in new and…

Arts & Culture
11
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
12
Balletx

Balletx expands the vocabulary of contemporary ballet for all audiences through innovative performances, world premiere choreography, dance education, and community programs.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Vivian Beaumont Theaterinc D/B/a Lincoln Center Theater; the most unlike its peers is National Stuttering Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOYCE THEATER: $75,000 · OtherJOYCE THEATERMANHATTAN THEATER: $62,500 · OtherMANHATTAN THEATERMANHATTAN THEATER CLUB: $55,034 · OtherMANHATTAN THEATER CLUBCHEVRA HATZALAH: $50,000 · OtherCHEVRA HATZALAHIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ROUNDABOUT THEATER: $44,050 · OtherTHE ROUNDABOUT THEATERTHE SIGNATURE THEATER: $40,000 · OtherTHE SIGNATURE THEATERALVIN ALLEY DANCE STUDIO: $30,000 · OtherALVIN ALLEY DANCE STUDIOAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR THE BLIND: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $42,000 · Other+5 moreMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $98,244 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INCNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $76,665 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY CENTER INCTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $66,800 · Arts & CultureTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INCLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS IN…THE PLAY PRODUCTION COMPANY INC: $42,586 · Arts & CultureTHE PLAY PRODUCTION COMPANY INCMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $11,875 · Arts & CultureNational Stuttering Association: $20,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR STEM CELL RESE: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 · HealthGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $56,500 · Human ServicesCITY HARVEST INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $20,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC: $10,000 · Social ScienceDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$468,584Arts & Culture$376,170Health$60,000Human Services$56,500Food & Nutrition$40,000Community Improvement$20,000Social Science$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $98,244 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $76,665 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $66,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $56,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PLAY PRODUCTION COMPANY INC: $42,586 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNational Stuttering Association: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR STEM CELL RESE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $5,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PLAY PRODUCTION COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds National Stuttering Association ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSICIANS ON CALL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR STEM CELL RESE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER ↗
  • Who funds DEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sla Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sla Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sla’s filings →

    More from the funding graph