Skip to content
Skaggs Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Skaggs Foundation

Invest in the health and wellness of taney and stone county residents through the programs, projects and services provided by community initiatives and cox medical center branson.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$608k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.0MEducation$474kHuman Services$174kCrime & Legal$110kYouth Development$98kPublic Safety & Disaster$93kFood & Nutrition$38kHousing & Shelter$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $1,613,938, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,743,579 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $129,641 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $192k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $371k
  • $250k+2 grants · $957k
$10,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COX MEDICAL CENTER BRANSON$607,715
HOPE COUNSELING CENTER$349,168
SIMMERING CENTER$170,000
MY NEIGHBOR'S CHARITABLE PHARMACY$150,800
THE BROOKS WELLNESS CENTER$50,346
CENTRAL TANEY COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT$35,896
OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$35,075
REEDS SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT$30,000
HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$30,000
BRANSON SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,000
GIFT OF HOPE$13,500
GALENA SCHOOL DISTRICT$11,272
CITY OF CRANE$10,630
OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION$10,500
BRANSON HOLLISTER SENIOR CENTER$7,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $8k → 16%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPOR: $20k → 15%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPOR: $20k → 15%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION: $11k → 15%SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $25k → 15%SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 15%SENIOR AGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 15%SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 15%HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $30k → 13%PATHWAYS PROJECT COALITION OF THE OZARKS: $8k → 13%GIFT OF HOPE: $14k → 14%GIFT OF HOPE: $7k → 14%BRANSON HOLLISTER SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 14%BRANSON HOLLISTER SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 26 repeat orgs$637k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
10

Total granted

$8.4M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $446k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SKAGGS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +51%
  • BI
    BURRELL INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $949k · revenue +247%
  • C
    COXHEALTH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $378k · revenue +288%

Funded once

  • CC
    COX COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $59k · revenue -11%
  • CA
    Christian Action Ministries
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +20%
  • CS
    CHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +142%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ozark Regional Share and Care

Provide basic human services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical, etc. for local people in need

Human Services
2
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
3
Healthcare Services of the Ozarks Inc

To provide high quality care and set the standards of excellence for those we serve.

Health
4
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
5
Gibson Center for Behavioral Change

The Gibson Center for Behavorial Change is committed to providing comprehensive services which promote new behaviors for a healthy lifestyle.

Health
6
Southwest Arkansas Counseling & Mental Health Center Inc

Southwest Arkansas Counseling and Mental Health Center, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides counseling and mental health services to residents of Southwest Arkansas.

Health
7
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council

Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…

Employment
8
Ozarks New Hope Inc

Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…

Health
9
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
10
Recovery Center of the Ozarks

To provide substance abuse counceling and services

Health
11
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
12
Northland Health Care Access

Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coxhealth; the most unlike its peers is Charis Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKAGGS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $4,194,277 · HealthSKAGGS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONFaith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center: $909,168 · HealthFaith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling CenterCOXHEALTH: $378,403 · HealthCOXHEALTHFORDLAND CLINIC INC: $338,000 · HealthFORDLAND CLINIC INC+3 more: $344,979 · Health+3 moreBURRELL INC: $949,210 · OtherBURRELL INCBRANSON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $279,486 · OtherBRANSON SCHOOL DISTRICTSTONE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $160,000 · OtherSTONE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM…REEDS SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT: $146,612 · OtherREEDS SPRING SCHOOL DISTRIC…HOLLISTER SCHOOL DISTRICT: $90,653 · OtherMARK TWAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $75,595 · OtherOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $75,000 · Other+22 more: $436,561 · Other+22 moreCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $325,200 · EducationSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $52,500 · Human ServicesOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $50,500 · Human ServicesHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesGIFT OF HOPE INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesBranson Senior Center: $13,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesPathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks: $7,500 · Human ServicesBROOK WELLNESS CENTER INC: $93,452 · ReligionCHARIS GROUP INC: $5,200 · ReligionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE OZARKS: $62,500 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE BRANSON: $37,124 · Food & Nutrition
Health$6,164,827Other$2,213,117Education$325,200Human Services$181,500Religion$98,652Youth Development$62,500Food & Nutrition$37,124

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSKAGGS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $4,194,277 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBURRELL INC: $949,210 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFaith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center: $909,168 over 7y, 44% of budgetCOXHEALTH: $378,403 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFORDLAND CLINIC INC: $338,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $325,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMy Neighbors Charitable Pharmacy: $150,800 over 1y, 42% of budgetBROOK WELLNESS CENTER INC: $93,452 over 2y, 15% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE OZARKS: $62,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCOX COLLEGE: $59,004 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $52,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $50,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELEVATE BRANSON: $37,124 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,075 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetChristian Action Ministries: $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC: $24,179 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGIFT OF HOPE INC: $20,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetBranson Senior Center: $13,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetOPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHARIS GROUP INC: $5,200 over 1y, 8.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SKAGGS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BURRELL INC ↗
  • Who funds Faith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds COXHEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FORDLAND CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds SIMMERING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds My Neighbors Charitable Pharmacy ↗
  • Who funds BROOK WELLNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds COX COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE BRANSON ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Christian Action Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE RIVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Branson Senior Center ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Arvest FoundationUnited Way of the Oza…Roy W Slusher Charita…The Herschend Family …Stanley & Elaine Ball…Ozarks Food Harvest I…Simmons First Foundat…Direct ReliefNatl Christian Charit…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO33.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Arvest Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · The Herschend Family Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Simmons First Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skaggs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skaggs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Skaggs Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Skaggs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skaggs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home