Skip to content

· Private foundation

Six Pillar Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$460k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.1MReligion$848kYouth Development$493kHuman Services$352kCommunity Improvement$85kHousing & Shelter$83kFood & Nutrition$60kEducation$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $350k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Anchor House$60,000
New Life Missions$50,000
ATK International$35,000
Anglican Relief and Development$30,000
Kinship United$30,000
Neighbor Up Brevard$25,000
Ubora TZ$25,000
Love INC$20,000
Young Life Space Coast$20,000
Urban Impact$20,000
Trust for Africa$20,000
Saint Stephens Way$20,000
Happy Life Childrens Home$20,000
Links of Hope$15,000
Open Heart for Orphans$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Urban Impact Foundation: $20k → 11%Urban Impact Foundation: $20k → 11%Urban Impact Foundation: $20k → 11%Urban Impact Foundation: $20k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%Links of Hope: $15k → 10%Links of Hope: $15k → 10%Links of Hope: $25k → 10%LINKS OF HOPE: $20k → 10%Links of Hope: $20k → 10%Links of Hope: $20k → 10%Links of Hope: $20k → 10%Links of Hope: $15k → 10%LINKS OF HOPE: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
SD
PA
CO
DE
KS
AR
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Six Pillar Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 46%.

Six Pillar Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 33 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
4

Total granted

$3.0M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+7%

Still filing today

52%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NYAKA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $217k · revenue +53%
  • WB
    WARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +103%
  • UI
    URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • NO
    Nyaka Ophans Ministry
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CW
    CAMP WINGMANN INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +7%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kirabo Africa Ministries

To Raise the next Generation of Uganda Christian leaders. To provide the love of Jesus, education, food, medical needs and shelter in a family style home for orphaned, destitute and vulnerable children.

International
2
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
3
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
4
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
5
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
6
Pearl Ministries Inc

Pearl Ministries partners with individuals, families, and churches to help orphans and vulnerable children in Uganda, the Pearl of Africa, through gospel centered, holistic development of family and community in partnership with indigenous…

Religion
7
Hines Ugandan Ministries

To meet the needs of orphans and widows in uganda with the love of jesus christ.

Religion
8
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
9
Angels in Africa
International
10
Rafiki Foundation Inc

To help africans know god and to help them raise their standard of living with excellence and integrity. rafiki is a christian, interdenominational mission organization incorporated in the united states. the foundation operates one rafiki…

International
11
Vision Africa Ministries Inc

Vision africa is a god centetred ministry and mission organization whose purpose is to share gods love with the african people empowering africans to develop, staff, and manage life-saving, life changing

Religion
12
Rakham International Missions Inc

We desire to make disciples and to equip people with practical and biblical tools to help improve their situation and that of those in their churches and communities. We believe in the unity of the body of Christ and to see the will of God…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Favor International Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Faith Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE MISSIONS INC: $189,000 · OtherNEW LIFE MISSIONS INCNew Hope Uganda: $148,000 · OtherNew Hope UgandaUNALTERED MINISTRIES: $145,000 · OtherUNALTERED MINISTRIESBNDC: $125,000 · OtherBNDCYoung Life Space Coast: $96,000 · OtherYoung Life Space CoastLove INC: $87,000 · OtherLove INCTHE FAITH FOUNDATION: $74,000 · OtherMustard Seed Project: $60,000 · OtherAnglican Relief and Development: $60,000 · OtherS Brevard Sharing Center: $53,000 · OtherNyaka Ophans Ministry: $50,000 · OtherUrban Impact: $50,000 · OtherTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $75,000 · OtherUBORATZ INC: $50,000 · Other+7 more: $181,000 · Other+7 moreANCHOR HOUSE INC: $345,000 · ReligionANCHOR HOUSE INCATK INTERNATIONAL INC: $155,000 · ReligionATK INTERNATIONAL I…THE JOSHUA FUND: $20,000 · ReligionHAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION: $110,000 · InternationalHAPPY LIFE C…THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT: $100,000 · InternationalTHE MUSTARD …RWANDA MINISTRY PARTNERS: $62,000 · InternationalRWANDA MINIS…BRIDGE2RWANDA INC: $55,000 · InternationalBRIDGE2RWAND…Favor International Inc: $20,000 · InternationalFavor Intern…LINKS OF HOPE INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesLINKS OF HO…URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesURBAN IMPAC…OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesOPEN HEARTS…NYAKA INC: $217,000 · Recreation & SportsWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED: $145,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP WINGMANN INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAINT STEPHENS WAY INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterBrevard Rescue Mission Inc: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF BREVARD INC: $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,443,000Religion$520,000International$347,000Human Services$305,000Recreation & Sports$217,000Youth Development$160,000Housing & Shelter$83,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANCHOR HOUSE INC: $345,000 over 9y, 43% of budgetNYAKA INC: $217,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetLINKS OF HOPE INC: $165,000 over 9y, 21% of budgetATK INTERNATIONAL INC: $155,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED: $145,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNALTERED MINISTRIES: $145,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetHAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION: $110,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT: $100,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetRWANDA MINISTRY PARTNERS: $62,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetBRIDGE2RWANDA INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUBORATZ INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSAINT STEPHENS WAY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBrevard Rescue Mission Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE JOSHUA FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFavor International Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP WINGMANN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BREVARD INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANCHOR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NYAKA INC ↗
  • Who funds LINKS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ATK INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED ↗
  • Who funds UNALTERED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAITH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RWANDA MINISTRY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE2RWANDA INC ↗
  • Who funds UBORATZ INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT STEPHENS WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Brevard Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSHUA FUND ↗
  • Who funds Favor International Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMP WINGMANN INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BREVARD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Margaret Heins FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Margaret Heins Foundation · Community Foundation for Brevard Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Six Pillar Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Six Pillar Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Camp Wingmann Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Six Pillar Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Six Pillar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Six Pillar’s filings →

More from the funding graph