Skip to content
Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc

To support the benevolent, charitable, scientific, religious, and educational activities of public charitable corporations.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$6.1MHuman Services$602kFood & Nutrition$467kEducation$374kPublic Safety & Disaster$312kCommunity Improvement$263kHousing & Shelter$261kYouth Development$239kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 58 grants below total $976,518, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,090,679 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $114,161 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $710k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $166k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROANE GENERAL HOSPITAL$66,000
MOV HEALTH DEPARTMENT$50,000
MID-OHIO FELLOWSHIP HOME$50,000
MARIETTA COLLEGE$45,600
GOPACKS$38,000
NORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$35,000
HOCKING ATHENS PERRY COMMUNITY ACTION$30,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE OHIO RIVER VALLEY$30,000
SW RESOURCES$30,000
CALHOUN COUNTY SCHOOLS$25,000
MEIGS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$25,000
OHIOHEALTH O'BLENESS HOSPITAL$24,000
RURAL ACTION$22,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT$20,855
MY SISTER'S PLACE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $710k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SOUTHEASTERN OHIO CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $15k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $35k → 15%LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE: $19k → 18%LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE: $10k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $5k → 15%LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE: $6k → 18%GALLIA-MEIGS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $15k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $5k → 15%RITCHIE COUNTY INTEGRATED FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 20%WOMEN FOR RECOVERY: $55k → 22%WAVERLY ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 19%CALHOUN FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $7k → 22%WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $21k → 15%JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $5k → 18%SAVANNAH'S CLOSET: $5k → 18%WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $20k → 15%WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $20k → 15%MY SISTER'S PLACE: $20k → 22%WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $18k → 15%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $15k → 22%SURVIVOR ADVOCACY OUTREACH PROGRAM: $15k → 22%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE OHIO RIVER VALLEY: $45k → 19%WASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $32k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE OHIO RIVER VALLEY: $30k → 19%WASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE: $5k → 15%WOMEN FOR RECOVERY: $5k → 22%PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC (HOUSE TO HOME): $29k → 19%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $5k → 22%LIFE & PURPOSE COMMUNITY: $5k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $5k → 15%WASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE: $5k → 15%FOURTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER CORPORATION: $25k → 19%WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $5k → 15%FOURTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER CORPORATION: $20k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $17k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $15k → 19%WOOD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $15k → 19%PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15k → 19%WOOD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $13k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $12k → 19%PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC (HOUSE TO HOME): $11k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE OHIO RIVER VALLEY: $10k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NORTHWEST: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $9k → 19%PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC (HOUSE TO HOME): $7k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $6k → 19%FOURTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER CORPORATION: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 109 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

109 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
107

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+17%

Still filing today

68%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $253k · revenue +94%
  • HC
    HOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +35%
  • MC
    Marietta College
    7× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOPE RECOVERY MANOR INC
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue -80%
  • SO
    SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH CHARITABLE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $68k · revenue +27%
  • OU
    OHIO UNIVERSITY- HERITAGE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
3
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
4
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
5
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
6
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc

Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
7
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
8
Summers County Council on Aging Inc

Provide services to senior citizens of Summers County, West Virginia.

Human Services
9
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
10
McDowell County Commission on Aging Inc

To provide services to senior citizens of McDowell County, West Virginia.

Human Services
11
Muskingum Valley Health Center

To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.

Health
12
Logan-Mingo Area Mental Health Inc

To collectively strengthen integrated behavioral and primary healthcare system by providing a continuum of services to the community that is responsive, accessible, and high-quality.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hockingathensperry Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Athens Area Mediation Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

150 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 150 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
143/150
Grantees still filing
111/150
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOPE RECOVERY MANOR INC: $300,000 · OtherTHE HOPE RECOVERY MANOR INCMID OHIO VALLEY HEALTH DEPT: $259,564 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $255,000 · OtherHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION: $245,543 · OtherTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $182,000 · OtherWV VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER INC: $180,500 · Other+119 more: $3,972,686 · Other+119 moreWESTBROOK HEALTH SERVICES INC: $148,750 · HealthWESTBROOK HEALTH…MARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $140,745 · HealthMARIETTA HEALTH …HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $127,500 · HealthHOPE HOUSE MINIS…SOUTHEAST OHIO FREE PHARMACY DBA RISING SUN: $115,000 · HealthSOUTHEAST OHIO F…WEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC: $77,380 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA OR…Roane County Patch Inc: $74,800 · HealthRoane County Pat…HARMONY MENTAL HEALTH INC: $64,500 · HealthSURVIVOR ADVOCACY OUTREACH PROGRAM: $61,775 · HealthMINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $55,000 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA HEALTHY KIDS AND FAMILIES COALITION: $46,345 · Health+20 more: $397,435 · Health+20 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $95,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $90,235 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $83,855 · Human ServicesWASHINGTO…CIRCLES CAMPAIGN OF MOV INC: $83,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLES C…WOMEN FOR RECOVERY: $63,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN FOR…PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $61,900 · Human ServicesPARKERSBU…FOURTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER CORPORATION: $50,035 · Human ServicesFOURTH CI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE: $35,000 · Human ServicesEDNA BROOKS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesWood County Senior Citizens Assoc: $27,500 · Human Services+11 more: $135,402 · Human Services+11 moreMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $252,500 · Community ImprovementRURAL ACTION INC: $209,900 · Community ImprovementAPPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS INC: $50,045 · Community Improvement+2 more: $21,200 · Community ImprovementMarietta College: $221,350 · EducationWEST VIRGINIANS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE: $67,500 · EducationEly Chapman Education Foundation: $65,080 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $47,500 · EducationALEXANDER PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $25,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 · EducationPARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC): $159,000 · PhilanthropySISTERS OF ST JOSEPH CHARITABLE FUND INC: $67,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC: $51,750 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC: $31,500 · PhilanthropyMARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCRITTENTON FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES: $190,845 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $88,000 · Food & NutritionGoPacks: $66,605 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,395,293Health$1,309,230Human Services$804,927Community Improvement$533,645Education$442,930Philanthropy$379,750Food & Nutrition$360,450

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $255,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $252,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION: $245,543 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMarietta College: $221,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRURAL ACTION INC: $209,900 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES: $190,845 over 6y, 21% of budgetTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $182,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetWV VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER INC: $180,500 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC: $170,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetSW RESOURCES INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC): $159,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $151,985 over 4y, 11% of budgetWESTBROOK HEALTH SERVICES INC: $148,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $140,745 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $127,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetSOUTHEAST OHIO FREE PHARMACY DBA RISING SUN: $115,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetMEIGS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $95,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $90,235 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $88,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INC: $86,845 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc: $86,611 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetHospital Development Co: $86,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT: $83,855 over 5y, 23% of budgetATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION: $81,500 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PLEASANTS CO: $77,775 over 5y, 13% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC: $77,380 over 3y, 32% of budgetRoane County Patch Inc: $74,800 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MOV: $72,500 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO: $72,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC: $69,665 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetLEGAL AID OF SOUTHEAST AND CENTRAL OHIO: $67,520 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSISTERS OF ST JOSEPH CHARITABLE FUND INC: $67,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIANS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE: $67,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetGoPacks: $66,605 over 6y, 22% of budgetEly Chapman Education Foundation: $65,080 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetWOMEN FOR RECOVERY: $63,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetPARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $61,900 over 4y, 31% of budgetSURVIVOR ADVOCACY OUTREACH PROGRAM: $61,775 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC: $52,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC: $51,750 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS INC: $50,045 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFOURTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER CORPORATION: $50,035 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA: $50,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SE OHIO: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTHY KIDS AND FAMILIES COALITION: $46,345 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOPE RECOVERY MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds THE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds WV VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SW RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC) ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTBROOK HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST OHIO FREE PHARMACY DBA RISING SUN ↗
  • Who funds MEIGS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hospital Development Co ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMELESS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLES CAMPAIGN OF MOV INC ↗
  • Who funds ATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PLEASANTS CO ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Roane County Patch Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MOV ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO ↗
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parkersburg Area Comm…Bernard McDonough Fou…Peoples Bank Foundati…United Way Alliance o…Marietta Community Fo…Athens County Foundat…Claude Worthington Be…Pallottine Foundation…Deitzler Foundation I…The Greater Kanawha V…Foundation for Appala…Highmark Foundation
Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc)WV170.3× affinity87 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · United Way Alliance of the Mid-Ohio Valley Inc · Marietta Community Foundation Inc · Athens County Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Deitzler Foundation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Foundation for Appalachian Ohio · Highmark Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 233 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sisters of St Joseph’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home