Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Singing Wood Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$241k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$241k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$266kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kReligion$16kEnvironment$12kInternational$12kAnimals$9kEducation$8kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$241,120
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FUNDS INC$241,120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $2k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
AZ
AR

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$72k · 10 repeat orgs$296k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
20

Total granted

$72k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+34%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $241k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsEmploymentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2018–2023 · $16k · revenue +9%
  • MH
    MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $7k · revenue +52%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMON FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UF
    UN FUTURO MEJOR INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -69%
  • FR
    FRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
2
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
3
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
4
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
5
Hand in Hand Mano en Mano

Mano en Mano works with farmworkers statewide and immigrants in Downeast Maine to empower them to thrive.

Education
6
CoreGiving Co

Engage in the charitable purpose of combating childhood hunger.

Philanthropy
7
Veap Inc

VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."

8
Sentinel Research

We help the public by foreseeing and reacting to globally impactful and existential catastrophes. We forecast near-term risks, detect black swans earlier, and deploy our emergency response team to take mitigating action.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
10
Veterans Navigation Network

Transition for service members.

Health
11
MyPath

MyPath provides youth from under-resourced communities with the financial knowledge, confidence, and tools they need to get on a path to building wealth.

12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farestart and the most unlike its peers is Un Futuro Mejor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FUNDS INC — $241,120 · OtherCOMMUNITY FUNDS INCCOMMON FUND INC — $15,000 · Other+22 more — $64,615 · Other+22 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $16,000 · Human ServicesBackbone Campaign — $2,000 · Human ServicesUN FUTURO MEJOR INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $7,000 · AnimalsAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · InternationalVASHON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $4,020 · HealthTHE CORNUCOPIA PROJECT INC — $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$320,735Human Services$18,000Philanthropy$10,000Animals$7,000International$4,500Health$4,020Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUN FUTURO MEJOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVASHON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $4,020 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA PROJECT INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJOURNEYMEN INSTITUTE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFARESTART — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBackbone Campaign — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTeen Lifeline Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVASHON EVENTS — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds UN FUTURO MEJOR INC
  • Who funds MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds VASHON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds THE CORNUCOPIA PROJECT INC
  • Who funds JOURNEYMEN INSTITUTE
  • Who funds FARESTART
  • Who funds Backbone Campaign
  • Who funds Teen Lifeline Inc
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS
  • Who funds VASHON EVENTS
  • Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Singing Wood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph