Skip to content
Singh Family Foundation Washington at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Singh Family Foundation Washington

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MEnvironment$1.3MHealth$812kAnimals$675kPhilanthropy$462kYouth Development$230kEmployment$128kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $165k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JANGI SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST$65,000
RAINIER SCHOLARS$50,000
THE VALERIE FUND$50,000
SAMBODH SOCIETY INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $250k → 17%American Bridge 21st Century Foundation: $50k → 14%SAMBODH SOCIETY INC: $7k → 12%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $325k → 9%INNER CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THE VALERIE FUND: $50k → 16%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $300k → 7%THE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $225k → 17%SAMBODH SOCIETY INC: $6k → 12%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $300k → 9%THE VALERIE FUND: $50k → 16%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200k → 7%THE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $150k → 17%SAMBODH SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%BigGigs: $5k → 9%THE VALERIE FUND: $50k → 16%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150k → 7%THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 17%SAMBODH SOCIETY INC: $3k → 12%FareStart: $100k → 9%THE VALERIE FUND: $50k → 16%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%SAMBODH SOCIETY INC: $3k → 12%ZGIRLS FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%The Valerie Fund: $10k → 16%SAMBODH SOCIETY INC: $3k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BELLEVUE: $125k → 9%THE SAMBODH SOCIETY: $3k → 12%RAINIER SCHOLARS: $50k → 9%THE SAMBODH SOCIETY: $3k → 12%RAINIER SCHOLARS: $50k → 9%THE SAMBODH SOCIETY: $3k → 12%RAINIER SCHOLARS: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY PREP ANNUAL FUND: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY PREP ANNUAL FUND: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $550k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $300k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $285k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%Food Lifeline: $100k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $200k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $127k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 9%Z GIRLS: $50k → 9%AUDUBON WASHINGTON: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Singh Family Foundation Washington’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Singh Family Foundation Washingtonlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 10 repeat orgs$745k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$3.4M
$745k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+21%

Still filing today

40%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentHealthPublic BenefitEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +46%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $327k · revenue +11%
  • FH
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    3× · 2017–2019 · $300k · revenue +355%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BELLEVUE
    one grant, 2018 · $125k
  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +6%
  • F
    FARESTART
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter

Arcs foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete degrees in science, engineering and medical research.

Education
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
11
Associated Universities Inc

Associated universities inc (aui) collaborates with the scientific community and research sponsors to plan, build, and operate cutting-edge facilities. we cultivate excellence, deliver value, enhance education, and engage the public.

Science & Tech
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,325,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $625,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYJANGI SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST: $341,000 · OtherJANGI SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUSTFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $327,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERTHE VALERIE FUND: $210,000 · OtherTHE VALERIE FUNDSHREE JANGI SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $185,000 · OtherSHREE JANGI SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BELLEVUE: $125,000 · Other+7 more: $141,602 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,210,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUND…RAINIER SCHOLARS: $149,950 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARSMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $85,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICATHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $300,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $25,000 · HealthFARESTART: $100,000 · EmploymentINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Employment+1 more: $3,000 · EmploymentFOOD LIFELINE: $100,000 · Food & NutritionAB FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Public BenefitHONOR FLIGHT SAN DIEGO: $25,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentZ GIRLS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,279,602Education$1,494,950Health$325,000Employment$128,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Public Benefit$75,000Environment$50,000Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,325,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,210,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $327,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND: $210,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $149,950 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARESTART: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $85,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZ GIRLS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetAB FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT SAN DIEGO: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Z GIRLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Singh Family Foundation Washington funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Singh Family Foundation Washington. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Singh Family Foundation Washington?

    Find your warmest path to Singh Family Foundation Washington through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Singh Family Foundation Washington’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home