Skip to content
Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$678kEducation$186kPhilanthropy$80kCommunity Improvement$74kHuman Services$54kYouth Development$53kReligion$20k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $149,498, the rows itemized in this filing. The $209,780 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,282 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,663
Median grant
1
States reached
$176M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Moorpark College Foundation$35,000
Soaring Spirits Loss Fdtn$35,000
Simi Valley Chamber of Com$23,835
CA Health Fund & Trust$15,663
Kiwanis Club of Simi Valley F$10,000
Rodary Club of Simi Sunrise$10,000
Boys and Girls Club Moorpark$10,000
Simi Valley Education Fdtn$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%For the Need Foundation: $16k → 10%RaisingHOPE Inc: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 12 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.0M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+26%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MOORPARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue +28%
  • SV
    SIMI VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +6%
  • SV
    SIMI VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • WF
    WESTMINSTER FREE CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +31%
  • FT
    FOR THE NEED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -9%
  • RI
    RAISINGHOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +158%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Simi Valley Soccer Club

Youth soccer program - recreation for youths

Recreation & Sports
2
Simi Valley Youth Soccer League

Simi youth soccer league provides extra-curricular recreation and sports activities for youth in the community.

Recreation & Sports
3
Simi Valley Friends of the Library Inc

Support of the simi valley public library

Education
4
Simi Valley Moose Lodge 1902

Lodge unites members in bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. accomplished through year round schedule of social and recreational activities for members/guests est at 375

—
5
Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
6
Rotary Club of Menlo Park Foundation

Scholarships & contributions

Community Improvement
7
Semiconductor Industry Association

The semiconductor industry association (sia) is the voice of the semiconductor industry, one of america's top export industries and a key driver of america's economic strength, national security, and global competitiveness. (continued on…

—
8
San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce

The chamber's mission is to create a strong local economy, provide premier business connections and visibility, represent the interests of business to government, promote the community and initiate political and community action.

—
9
Simi Valley Historical Society

To acquire, preserve, maintain, identify and mark historical buildings, sites and landmarks; to collect artifacts of historical significance; to provide and maintain a sanctuary for such artifacts; to provide for a reservoir of historical…

Arts & Culture
10
Suffield Rotary Foundation Inc

Community service organization

Education
11
Morgan Hill Kiwanis Youth Fund
Youth Development
12
San Ramon Valley Kiwanis Foundation

Community service club whose primary purpose is to improve the local community through providing funds from fund raising events to local organizations that provide services and/or opportunities to local youth and the elderly.

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kiwanis Club of Simi Valley Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $623,811 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUSTSoaring Spirits International: $65,000 · PhilanthropySoaring Spirits International+1 more: $15,430 · PhilanthropyTHE MOORPARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $135,000 · OtherTHE MOORPARK COLLEGE FOUND…SIMI VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $30,035 · OtherSIMI VALLEY CHAMBER OF COM…MOORPARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $18,100 · OtherMOORPARK CHAMBER OF COMMER…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SIMI VALLEY: $17,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SIMI …ROTARY CLUB OF MOORPARK: $15,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF MOORPARKCITY OF SIMI VALLEY: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS: $10,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF SIMI SUNRISE: $10,000 · OtherSimi Valley Unified School Di: $10,000 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP INC: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,079 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF SIMI VALLEY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesFOR THE NEED FOUNDATION: $15,500 · Human ServicesRAISINGHOPE INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $25,000 · HealthNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthFREE CLINIC OF SIMI VALLEY: $7,572 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,437 · HealthSIMI VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,500 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOORPARK & SIMI VALLEY INC: $20,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$704,241Other$270,714Human Services$59,500Health$54,009Education$35,500Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $623,811 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MOORPARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetSoaring Spirits International: $65,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSIMI VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetSIMI VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $30,035 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF SIMI VALLEY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOORPARK & SIMI VALLEY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMOORPARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $18,100 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SIMI VALLEY: $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MOORPARK: $15,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetFOR THE NEED FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSIMI SUNRISE ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $15,430 over 2y, 44% of budgetRAISINGHOPE INC: $14,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SIMI VALLEY: $7,572 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,437 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ventura County Commun…California Community …Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ventura County Community FoundationCA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ventura County Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley?

    Find your warmest path to Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home