Skip to content
Silvey Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Silvey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$328kHousing & Shelter$220kFood & Nutrition$94kYouth Development$50kEducation$46kHealth$28kReligion$22kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $118k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER$33,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH$25,000
TUALATIN FOOD PANTRY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MT HOOD KIWANAS CAMP$8,060
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$7,500
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$7,500
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $5k → 8%OREGON HARBOR OF HOPE: $13k → 12%LA LUZ CENTER: $6k → 9%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $2k → 8%LA LUZ CENTER: $4k → 9%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $1k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $25k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $20k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $19k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $14k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $14k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $10k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $10k → 8%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$733k · 27 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
20

Total granted

$733k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+33%

Still filing today

48%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EW
    EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $192k · revenue +170%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $111k · revenue +7%
  • TUALATIN SCHOOL HOUSE FOOD PANTRY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue ×15

Funded once

  • BF
    BORLAND FREE CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +490%
  • OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -22%
  • A VILLAGE FOR ONE
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
2
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
3
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
4
Therapeutic Health Services

Improved quality of life for all. Out clients in recovery and those managing their mental illness need more than counseling and medication treatments to function at their greatest capacity. That's why we offer a complete range of…

Health
5
Northwest Counseling Service Inc

Housing Counseling Services

Housing & Shelter
6
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
7
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
8
New Narrative

From clinical care and peer support programs to housing, we provide resources so people seeking mental health care can develop the tools to thrive, not just survive.

Human Services
9
Family Forward Oregon

We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.

Human Services
10
Neighborhood Health Center

The mission of neighborhood health center is to increase access to health care services in the communities in which we serve, by providers who are passionate about quality health care for each individual and family member.

Health
11
Northeast Oregon Network

Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…

Health
12
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Raphael House of Portland; the most unlike its peers is Team Titin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $114,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTUALATIN FOOD PANTRY: $30,000 · OtherTUALATIN FOOD PANTRYFAMILY PROMISE: $27,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISEPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITYUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $16,000 · OtherMT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP: $15,060 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $11,500 · OtherTEAM TITIN INC: $16,300 · Other+21 more: $67,050 · Other+21 moreEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $191,858 · Housing & ShelterEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHEL…OREGON ENERGY FUND: $11,750 · Housing & ShelterOREGON ENERGY FUNDNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $110,750 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST CHILDRENS O…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $16,250 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORT…OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $12,500 · Human ServicesOREGON TRAIL OF HOPELA LUZ CENTER: $9,500 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENTERCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesTUALATIN SCHOOL HOUSE FOOD PANTRY: $41,800 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $6,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionNew Directions for Youth Inc: $28,500 · EmploymentBORLAND FREE CLINIC: $14,000 · HealthHEALING ODYSSEY INC: $5,000 · HealthCentral City Concern: $4,000 · HealthA VILLAGE FOR ONE: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentFosterClub Inc: $7,900 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS BUILD: $3,750 · Youth Development
Other$344,910Housing & Shelter$203,608Human Services$160,500Food & Nutrition$48,800Employment$28,500Health$23,000Youth Development$20,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $191,858 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $110,750 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTUALATIN SCHOOL HOUSE FOOD PANTRY: $41,800 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetNew Directions for Youth Inc: $28,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTEAM TITIN INC: $16,300 over 2y, 24% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $16,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP: $15,060 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $12,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOREGON ENERGY FUND: $11,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER: $9,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA VILLAGE FOR ONE: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFosterClub Inc: $7,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING ODYSSEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE CONTINGENT: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral City Concern: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS BUILD: $3,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOREGON HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $3,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUALATIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds TUALATIN SCHOOL HOUSE FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds New Directions for Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEAM TITIN INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds BORLAND FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds OREGON ENERGY FUND ↗
  • Who funds LA LUZ CENTER ↗
  • Who funds A VILLAGE FOR ONE ↗
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FosterClub Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING ODYSSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONTINGENT ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS BUILD ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
  • Who funds TUALATIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Oregon Community …The Autzen FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Juan Young TrustMeyer Memorial TrustM J Murdock Charitabl…The Hart Family Found…Remax Pnw FoundationBraemar Charitable Tr…Maybelle Clark Macdon…The Collins Foundation
OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Hart Family Foundation · Remax Pnw Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Collins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silvey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silvey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Clackamas Women's Services: 33% of income from government
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • A Village for One: 33% of income from government
  • FosterClub Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp: 18% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • The Contingent: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Silvey Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Silvey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Silvey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home