Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Remax Pnw Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of REMAX PNW FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$622
Median grant
2
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$16,310
READING RESULTS$3,500
HOW CAN WE HELP$3,175
KINSHIP HOUSE$3,100
FRIENDLY HOUSE$3,000
YOUTH VILLAGES OF OREGON$2,700
Individual grant recipient$2,636
PROJECT 48$2,600
SHADOW PROJECT$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH$2,260
HUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON$2,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$1,495
BRADLEY ANGLE HOUSE$1,400
GOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER$1,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FORWARD STRIDE: $9k → 8%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $2k → 8%FORWARD STRIDE: $1k → 8%FOSTERFUL: $4k → 9%FOSTERFUL: $2k → 9%FOSTERFUL: $1k → 9%FORWARD STIDE: $400 → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $3k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $2k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $1k → 8%NW CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $1k → 8%SAVING GRACE MATERNITY: $4k → 8%SAVING GRACE MATERNITY: $2k → 8%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $3k → 12%SAVING GRACE MATERNITY: $2k → 8%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $3k → 12%SAVING GRACE MATERNITY: $325 → 8%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $275 → 8%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $2k → 12%SAVING GRACE MATERNITY: $100 → 8%RAHABS SISTERS: $3k → 12%RAHABS SISTERS: $1k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $5k → 12%PROJECT 48: $4k → 12%PROJECT 48: $3k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $1k → 12%GUNG HO MINISTRIES: $250 → 12%GUNG HO MINISTRIES: $175 → 12%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $2k → 8%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $2k → 8%GUNG HO MINISTRIES: $125 → 12%GROWING GARDEN: $3k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF TUALATIN VALLEY: $2k → 8%GROWING GARDEN: $200 → 12%BRADLEY ANGLE HOUSE: $1k → 12%COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $600 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$364k · 55 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

55 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
42

Total granted

$364k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KINSHIP HOUSE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +50%
  • FORWARD STRIDE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • SG
    SAVING GRACE MATERNITY HOME
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +23%
  • CW
    CASA WAS MULT AND COL CTY
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • SELF ENHANCEMENT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trillium Family Services

Building brighter futures with children and families.

Housing & Shelter
2
A Family for Every Child

A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

Human Services
3
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
4
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
5
Friends of the Children- Central Oregon

Friends of the children - central oregon is a oregon based nonprofit with the mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years,…

Youth Development
6
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
7
Morrison Child and Family Services

Helping kids be kids, and supporting families when they need us most. morrison serves over 8,000 youth and families annually through ten distinct programs designed to meet the needs of our clients.

Health
8
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
9
Friends of the Children-Portland

Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…

Youth Development
10
Christian Community Placement Center

A christian organization compassionately serving youth and families, providing them counseling, mentoring, skill building and education services in safe environment, to support the development of their hope and future.

Human Services
11
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
12
Parenting With Intent

Building strong connections for healthy communities through mental health programs, youth empowerment services and family services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Raphael House of Portland and the most unlike its peers is Westside Food Brigade. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySupportive Housing and Cris…Black Community Food & Econ…Service Club FoundationsYouth Development ProgramsPerforming Arts PresentersEarly Childhood EducationAnimal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%2%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr19%40%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr14%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%7%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr12%22%35–55yr14%11%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/73
the rest of the field
12%
1,279/10,274

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/67
Grantees still filing
44/67
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK — $82,085 · OtherCHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORKCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $38,130 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKIndividual grant recipient — $29,681 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWITH LOVE — $17,680 · Other+66 more — $170,023 · Other+66 moreFORWARD STRIDE — $9,950 · Human ServicesFORWARD STRIDESAVING GRACE MATERNITY HOME — $8,036 · Human ServicesSAVING GRACE MAT…NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH — $7,260 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST CHILDR…FRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDLY HOUSE I…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND — $6,303 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF…FOSTERFUL — $6,100 · Human ServicesFOSTERFULPROJECT 48 INC — $6,100 · Human ServicesPROJECT 48 INCREFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST — $3,800 · Human ServicesRAHAB'S SISTERS — $3,500 · Human ServicesGrowing Gardens — $2,700 · Human ServicesFamily Promise of Tualatin Valley — $2,475 · Human Services+7 more — $8,250 · Human Services+7 moreKINSHIP HOUSE — $17,322 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $3,500 · HealthLines for Life — $2,600 · HealthCHELSEA HICKS FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON — $1,400 · HealthSOARING HEIGHTS RECOVERY HOMES — $980 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthROCK N ROOMS — $8,161 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $2,575 · Youth DevelopmentMAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentPortland YouthBuilders — $1,695 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — $750 · Youth DevelopmentSauvie Island Center — $5,100 · Food & NutritionHUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON — $3,752 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BRIGADE — $1,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $600 · Food & NutritionTHE SHADOW PROJECT — $7,500 · EducationHillsboro Schools Foundation — $2,155 · EducationSMART READING — $1,000 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $5,550 · Crime & LegalChildrens Center — $4,206 · Crime & Legal
Other$337,599Human Services$71,474Health$28,502Youth Development$15,681Food & Nutrition$10,952Education$10,855Crime & Legal$9,756

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $38,130 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINSHIP HOUSE — $17,322 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFORWARD STRIDE — $9,950 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC — $8,487 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCK N ROOMS — $8,161 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetSAVING GRACE MATERNITY HOME — $8,036 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP — $7,536 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHADOW PROJECT — $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH — $7,260 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREADING RESULTS — $7,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND — $6,303 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTERFUL — $6,100 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT 48 INC — $6,100 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC — $5,739 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,703 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPLAY IT FORWARD — $5,575 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $5,550 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC — $5,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSauvie Island Center — $5,100 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBOOKMOBILE BABE — $4,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetChildrens Center — $4,206 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST — $3,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON — $3,752 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRAHAB'S SISTERS — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES — $3,452 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUCKER MAXON SCHOOL — $3,041 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPARROW CLUBS USA — $2,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGrowing Gardens — $2,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLines for Life — $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $2,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDWARDS CENTER INC — $2,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHELSEA HICKS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP FIRE COLUMBIA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Promise of Tualatin Valley — $2,475 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHillsboro Schools Foundation — $2,155 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BEAVERTON CITY LIBRARY — $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFOLK-TIME INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTORYLINE COMMUNITY — $1,752 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPortland YouthBuilders — $1,695 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE — $1,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BRIGADE — $1,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $1,495 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON — $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
  • Who funds KINSHIP HOUSE
  • Who funds FORWARD STRIDE
  • Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC
  • Who funds ROCK N ROOMS
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE MATERNITY HOME
  • Who funds MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP
  • Who funds THE SHADOW PROJECT
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH
  • Who funds READING RESULTS
  • Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds FOSTERFUL
  • Who funds PROJECT 48 INC
  • Who funds EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PLAY IT FORWARD
  • Who funds CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY
  • Who funds THE DOUGY CENTER INC
  • Who funds Sauvie Island Center
  • Who funds BOOKMOBILE BABE
  • Who funds Childrens Center
  • Who funds REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST
  • Who funds HUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON
  • Who funds RAHAB'S SISTERS
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation TrustOR74.8× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Hoover Family Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Remax Pnw Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 210%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Edwards Center Inc79% of income from government
  • Lines for Life70% of income from government
  • Portland YouthBuilders35% of income from government
  • Clackamas Women's Services33% of income from government
  • Play It Forward30% of income from government
  • Folk-Time Inc26% of income from government
  • Oregon Community Warehouse Inc24% of income from government
  • Project 48 Inc23% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp18% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc14% of income from government
  • My Voice Music Inc11% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland10% of income from government
  • Bradley Angle10% of income from government
  • The Shadow Project8% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens6% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest4% of income from government
  • Smart Reading3% of income from government
  • Friendly House Inc3% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc1% of income from government
  • William Temple House0% of income from government
  • Casa of Clackamas County0% of income from government
  • Childrens Center0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Remax Pnw Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Remax Pnw Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph