· Private foundation
Signeski Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STROM FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND | $79,400 |
| CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA | $25,000 |
| SUN ANGEL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTIME OUT INC4× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue +122%
- PCPAYSON COMMUNITY KIDS INC2× · 2022–2023 · $85k · revenue +55% · 27% of their budget
- SCSOJOURNER CENTER6× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- PCPhoenix Children's Hospitalgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +30%
- HOHOUSE OF REFUGE INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -1%
- PCPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundationone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To rescue and save homeless, unwanted, abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
Rescue, rehabilitation and "re-homing" of unwanted and abandoned dogs.
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
Cat rescue providing medical care and placement of cats/kittens with both foster families and forever homes
Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.
Pawsitively cats is a no-kill cat shelter in tucson for homeless cats that provides compassionate care until a loving permanent home can be found. pawsitively cats also promotes trap, neuter and release (tnr) for feral cats. pawsitively…
The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIME OUT INC ↗
- Who funds PAYSON COMMUNITY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
- Who funds Healing Hearts Animal Rescue and Refuge ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Check For a Lump ↗
- Who funds LIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PAYSON CHRISTIAN CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SUN ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DESERT LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Rim Country Arizonans for Children ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL AZ INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Express Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Signeski Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Charitable Gift America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.