Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sigmond & Marie P Baer Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$99kCommunity Improvement$70kHousing & Shelter$45kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$29kHuman Services$28kRecreation & Sports$25kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$276k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACADEMY MR BENJAMIN GILDEHAUS$5,000
FOOD OUTREACH INC$5,000
CITY ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CENTER FOR HEARING SPEECH$2,500
INTERFAITH RESIDENCE DBA DOORWAYS$2,500
MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 10 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$317k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+8%

Still filing today

80%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    INTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS
    6× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +123%
  • FO
    FOOD OUTREACH INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +71%
  • MC
    MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS
    6× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +80%
  • VT
    VARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • LI
    LOGOS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Academy Inc

See schedule o.city academy transforms children, families and our community through exceptional education and bold expectations that empower children to overcome barriers.

Education
2
Churchill School and Center

To provide an innovative and transformational k-12 learning community that empowers students with language-based learning disabilities.

Education
3
Baltimore Lab School Inc

Baltimore Lab School is an innovative learning community fostering scholarship and creativity in students with different learning styles. In an environment of inquiry and hands-on exploration, Baltimore Lab School students learn to…

Education
4
League School

The league school provides educational (ages 5-21) and mental health programs for students with intellectual, developmental and/or psychiatric disabilities.

—
5
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
6
Lakeshore Intergenerational School

Lakeshore Intergenerational School is the second replicationof the award-winning Intergenerational School that opened on Cleveland 's east side in 2000. The school features a curriculum where students learn at their own pace and knowlege…

Education
7
Strafford Learning Center

Providing specialized educational programs and services to the children and youth who are a special part of our journey together.

—
8
Speech & Hearing Center of the Midsouth Dba Memphis Oral School for the Deaf

Empowering deaf children to listen, learn and talk.

—
9
Face to Face Academy

The Academy is a unique alternative high school, which provides youth with an opportunity to acquire an education, life skills, and emotional growth. The Academy is based on an integrated service system model, which combines academic…

Education
10
Clover Nola Inc

Clover nola educates children, strengthens families, and builds communities.

Human Services
11
Tlc - the Treatment & Learning Centers

To improve lives and expand possibilities for individuals with disabilities by providing educational, therapeutic and employment services.

—
12
Christopher House

Christopher house is a family of schools that helps children and families succeed in school, the workplace, and life. through our unique and innovative approach, we are effectively closing the opportunity gap through a continuum of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lift for Life Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leader Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEADER FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherLEADER FOUNDATIONCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $53,000 · OtherCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECHMEMORY HOME CARE SOLUTIONS: $17,500 · OtherMEMORY HOME CARE SOLUTIONS+6 more: $22,500 · Other+6 moreINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $42,500 · HealthINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/…MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $38,000 · HealthMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTION…FOOD OUTREACH INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD OUTREAC…LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC: $31,300 · Recreation & SportsLIFT FOR …THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCity Academy: $5,000 · EducationLOGOS INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $2,500 · EducationBREAKPOINT TENNIS AND LIFE SKILLS A: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAFER WATERS IN MEMORY - OF NICHOLAS: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$163,000Health$80,500Food & Nutrition$40,000Recreation & Sports$31,300Human Services$15,000Education$12,500Youth Development$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEADER FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 41% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $53,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $42,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD OUTREACH INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $38,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC: $31,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKPOINT TENNIS AND LIFE SKILLS A: $10,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE OASIS INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCity Academy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOGOS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFER WATERS IN MEMORY - OF NICHOLAS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEWBURGH INTERFAITH EMERGENCY HOUSING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEADER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKPOINT TENNIS AND LIFE SKILLS A ↗
  • Who funds THE OASIS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds City Academy ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOGOS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFER WATERS IN MEMORY - OF NICHOLAS ↗
  • Who funds NEWBURGH INTERFAITH EMERGENCY HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pott Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Olive Dempsey Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · Centene Foundation · Herbert and Adrian Woods Fdn · Express Scripts Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sigmond & Marie P Baer Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sigmond & Marie P Baer Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sigmond & Marie P Baer Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph