Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Shum Charitable Fund

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2026
6
Organizations funded FY2025
17%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$2,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 14
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
2
Total assets, FY2026
$50k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 17% of the organizations Shum Charitable Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 58% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving4$4k25%
FY20256$3k17%
FY20245$3k80%
FY20237$6k57%
FY20223$3k0%
FY20216$5k33%
FY20204$5k0%
FY201914$8k36%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Human Services$21kHealth$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kArts & Culture$4kReligion$3kPhilanthropy$2kHousing & Shelter$866Food & Nutrition$450Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($23k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Shum Charitable Fund supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,797 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's Healthcare Foundation: $6,333 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNo Limits Theater Group Inc: $3,025 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetConejo Free Clinic: $2,045 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCamarillo Hospice Corporation: $1,080 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCamarillo Ranch Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGold Coast Veterans Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRescue Mission Alliance: $866 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $795 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMeadowlark Service League: $615 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFellowship Foundation Inc: $185 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeboy Industries: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamarillo Chamber of Commerce: $90 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Camarillo Library: $40 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMothers Against Drunk Driving: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meadowlark Service LeagueCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meadowlark Service League · LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION co MUSICK PEELER & GARRETT LLP · Ventura County Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Shum Charitable Fund with peer funders

About Shum Charitable Fund

How much does Shum Charitable Fund give?
Shum Charitable Fund reported 4 grants totaling $3,834 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 14 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does Shum Charitable Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2026, its largest causes are Human Services (39%), Health (20%), Public Safety & Disaster (19%).
Who are Shum Charitable Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2026: American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ($8k), St John's Healthcare Foundation ($6k), No Limits Theater Group Inc ($3k).
Does Shum Charitable Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Shum Charitable Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Shum Charitable Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Meadowlark Service League, LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION co MUSICK PEELER & GARRETT LLP, Ventura County Community Foundation.
Where is Shum Charitable Fund based?
Shum Charitable Fund is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shum’s filings →

More from the funding graph