Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shrontz Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Shrontz Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Shrontz Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $90k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
7
’18
6
’19
5
’20
5
’21
6
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.7MEducation$143kHuman Services$133kHealth$103kFood & Nutrition$42kHousing & Shelter$35kCommunity Improvement$30kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREEHOUSE$30,000
TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION$15,000
MOUNT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB$15,000
OPERATION NIGHTWATCH$10,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
STORYTELLER CHILDREN'S CENTER$5,000
GLEN WORLD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTHCARE: $10k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $10k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$463k · 12 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$463k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+50%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TREEHOUSE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $113k · revenue +172%
  • SC
    STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +72%
  • TB
    TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $45k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • I
    INVESTEDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +50%
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS OF WA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
2
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
3
The Washington Bus

We empower Washington youth leaders to create sustainable, positive change through advocacy, youth voter turnout, and leadership development programs.

Civil Rights
4
Family Law Casa of King County

Family law casa is committed to positive long-term outcomes for children, families, and communities navigating economic injustice across king county. we advance intersectional equity by providing free advocacy services for children…

Human Services
5
Friends of the Children - Seattle

Friends of the children - seattle has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. youth in the friends…

Youth Development
6
Bike Works Seattle

Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.

Recreation & Sports
7
Orcas Island Childrens House

The mission of oich is to prepare children for kindergarten and lifeby providing dynamic play-based curriculum in an inclusive environment

Education
8
Mt Washington Childrens Center

Childrens day care center

Human Services
9
Cares of Washington

Support people with disabilities and low incomes to realize their purpose, potential and strength.

Employment
10
Whole Child Collaborative

To provide a holistic, multidisciplinary education to learners of all abilities

Education
11
Seattle Jobs Initiative

Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.

Employment
12
American Youthworks

American youthworks (ayw) annually provides 400+ young adults with training and resources to build careers and strengthen their communities through education, paid career training, and national service. ayw programs prepare participants…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treehouse; the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,730,444 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+2 more: $45,000 · PhilanthropySTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $70,000 · OtherSTORYTELLER C…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $57,500 · OtherSEATTLE CHILD…RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $42,000 · OtherRAINIER VALLE…MARTIN LUTHER KING SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $32,500 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER…THE MT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB: $30,000 · OtherTHE MT BAKER …GLEN WORLD: $10,000 · OtherAGE UP - ALL GIRL EVERYTHING ULTIMATE PROGRAM: $9,000 · Other+2 more: $7,000 · OtherTREEHOUSE: $112,500 · Youth DevelopmentMaris Place: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $45,000 · HealthYOUTHCARE: $24,500 · Human ServicesOPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $10,000 · InternationalSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 · Education
Philanthropy$1,775,444Other$258,000Youth Development$116,500Health$45,000Human Services$34,500International$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,730,444 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $112,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $42,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB: $30,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetINVESTED: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $24,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $20,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetOPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE MT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds INVESTED ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shrontz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shrontz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shrontz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shrontz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shrontz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph