Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shrewsbury Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$191kEducation$157kPhilanthropy$118kYouth Development$65kCivil Rights$38kHousing & Shelter$26kEmployment$25kEnvironment$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $134k
$6,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS$25,000
JUST NEIGHBORS$25,000
DREAM PROJECT$22,165
CREATE NOW$19,583
MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY$12,500
BASCAM$10,000
STROKE COMEBACK CENTER$10,000
IYRS SCHGOOL OF TECH AND TRADES$10,000
INTERFAITH NEIGHBORS$6,500
BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN CENTER$6,000
CANCERCRUSHER FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PARKER FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$4,000
RUMSON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,100
MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$830k · 30 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
25

Total granted

$830k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+26%

Still filing today

57%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +96%
  • DP
    DREAM PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +183%
  • SC
    STROKE COMEBACK CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHORE CLUBHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -30%
  • FR
    Fall River Historical Societygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +101%
  • VH
    VNA HEALTH GROUP CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
2
Community Medical Center

The organization, a not-for-profit acute care hospital serving the ocean county region, is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services including…

Health
3
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
4
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
5
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
6
Independent Colleges and Universities of New Jersey a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of the independent colleges and universities of new jersey, a new jersey non-profit corporation is to advance the interests of new jersey's independent, non-profit, public mission institutions of higher education by promoting…

—
7
Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research Inc

The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).

Environment
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monmouth Medical Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUST NEIGHBORS: $56,000 · OtherJUST NEIGHBORSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $35,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSBASCAM: $35,000 · OtherBASCAMIYRS SCHGOOL OF TECH AND TRADES: $34,583 · OtherIYRS SCHGOOL OF TECH AND TRADESINTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC: $32,500 · OtherINTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INCMERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherMERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION+31 more: $118,275 · Other+31 moreDREAM PROJECT INC: $101,165 · EducationDREAM PROJECT INCMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $55,000 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INCCREATE NOW INC: $38,583 · EducationCREATE NOW INCWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $30,825 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC+1 more: $2,500 · EducationSTROKE COMEBACK CENTER: $68,000 · HealthSTROKE COMEBACK CEN…CANCERCRUSHER FOUNDATION INC: $55,250 · HealthCANCERCRUSHER FOUND…MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $12,250 · HealthMONMOUTH MEDICAL CE…SHORE CLUBHOUSE INC: $10,000 · HealthSHORE CLUBHOUSE INCTHOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Health+3 more: $5,500 · HealthTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS: $131,975 · PhilanthropyTHE FRIENDS OF GR…ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyARLINGTON COMMUNI…+2 more: $4,100 · PhilanthropyMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $17,225 · Environment+2 more: $1,100 · EnvironmentInternational Rescue Committee INC: $18,000 · InternationalArlington Food Assistance Center: $15,850 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$336,858Education$228,073Health$158,000Philanthropy$146,075Environment$18,325International$18,000Food & Nutrition$16,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS: $131,975 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetDREAM PROJECT INC: $101,165 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetSTROKE COMEBACK CENTER: $68,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCANCERCRUSHER FOUNDATION INC: $55,250 over 9y, 55% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCREATE NOW INC: $38,583 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetINTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $30,825 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $17,225 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center: $15,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $12,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHORE CLUBHOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFall River Historical Society: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRUMSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFairfield University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILDRED MINDELL CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUMSON ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRED BANK CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM INSTITUTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHousing Rights Initiative: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
  • Who funds DREAM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STROKE COMEBACK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CANCERCRUSHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHORE CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fall River Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY PARK ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Parker Family Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RUMSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oceanfirst FoundationNJ19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · The Gravina Family Foundation Inc · Manasquan Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · Marjorie & Clarence E Unterberg Fdninc · Mary Owen Borden Memorial Fund · Jam Anonymous Foundation Inc · The Stone Foundation of New Jersey · Lucile and Maurice Pollak Fund · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shrewsbury Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shrewsbury Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Interfaith Neighbors Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Shore Clubhouse Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Fall River Historical Society: 2% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shrewsbury Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Shrewsbury Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shrewsbury’s filings →

More from the funding graph