Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shrensky Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$224k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$600kReligion$526kSocial Science$482kArts & Culture$201kHousing & Shelter$111kHealth$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$24,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON$60,000
MESORAH DC$50,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM$25,000
CENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC$25,000
MAOR INSTITUTE$24,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYIM$15,000
TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON$10,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$5,000
COMMUNITY OF HOPE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $31k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYIM: $15k → 20%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $75k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $25k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYIM: $12k → 20%CAPITAL JEWISH MUSEUM: $13k → 14%MAOR INSTITUTE: $71k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $25k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYIM: $12k → 20%CAPITAL JEWISH MUSEUM: $13k → 14%MAOR INSTITUTE: $60k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $35k → 14%MAOR INSTITUTE: $60k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $20k → 14%MAOR INSTITUTE: $60k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $20k → 17%COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $15k → 14%MAOR INSTITUTE: $60k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $20k → 17%COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $15k → 14%MAOR INSTITUTE: $60k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $20k → 17%MAOR INSTITUTE: $60k → 8%MAOR INSTITUTE: $51k → 8%CENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $50k → 8%CENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $50k → 8%CENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $25k → 8%CENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $25k → 8%MAOR INSTITUTE: $24k → 8%MESORAH DC: $50k → 8%MESORAH DC: $50k → 8%MESORAH DC: $50k → 8%MESORAH DC: $50k → 8%MESORAH DC: $50k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $75k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $60k → 8%TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $18k → 8%TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $13k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+26%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureReligionCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $555k · revenue +44%
  • MI
    MESORAH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +53%
  • CO
    COMMUNITY OF HOPE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $116k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Baltimore Torah School Inc

The mission of baltimore torah school, inc., a boys school for grades 8- 12, is to produce young men who are motivated to find satisfaction and joy in learning and serving g-d, capable of advancing to excellent advanced jewish study…

Education
8
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael of Atlanta Inc

Inspire and assist each student in his quest to nurture a personal relationship with hashem, develop and refine his character, immerse himself in serious torah scholarship and attain the knowledge and skills necessary to be an articulate…

Education
9
Yeshiva University High Schools

The yeshiva university high schools has as its educational mission to teach and perpetuate the values of torah and secular studies. see schedule o.

Education
10
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
11
University of Judaism Foundation
—
12
Rabbi David L Silver Yeshiva Academy

To provide education in general and judiac studies

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society for Yad Vashem Inc; the most unlike its peers is American University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAOR INSTITUTE: $505,500 · OtherMAOR INSTITUTECENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $225,000 · OtherCENTER FOR JEWISH LIVING NORTH MONTGOMERY CO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYIM: $101,400 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS MIR YERUSHALAYI…Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $555,000 · EducationYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INCTHE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $90,000 · EducationTHE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHIN…AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationMESORAH INC: $290,000 · ReligionMESORAH INCAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $190,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SO…Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLillian and…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $115,500 · Community ImprovementLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · Health
Other$866,900Education$670,000Religion$290,000Arts & Culture$230,500Community Improvement$115,500Health$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $555,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetMESORAH INC: $290,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $190,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $115,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shrensky Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shrensky Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Torah School of Greater Washington Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shrensky Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Shrensky Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shrensky’s filings →

More from the funding graph