Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shoemaker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$290kHuman Services$141kEducation$71kYouth Development$53kHealth$37kRecreation & Sports$37kInternational$35kPublic Benefit$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL$15,000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$15,000
OPEN SKY POLICY INSTITUTE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEBRASKA APPLESEED$10,000
NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST$10,000
CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
MATT TALBOT KITCHEN AND OUTREACH$5,000
FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN$5,000
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE$5,000
CAMBRIDGE SENIOR CENTER INC$3,000
SMA FAMILY AND FRIENDS$3,000
TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Shoemaker Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 88%.

Shoemaker Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$624k · 21 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$624k
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+553%

Still filing today

57%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +148%
  • NJ
    NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +75%
  • CR
    CRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $35k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • CS
    CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
  • FF
    FLATWATER FREE PRESS NEWSPAPER
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TC
    THE CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
2
Nebraska Civic Engagement Table

The nebraska civic engagement table works with nonprofits to increase voting and build an engaged nebraska.

Civil Rights
3
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
4
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
5
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
6
Community Action of Nebraska Inc

Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.

Community Improvement
7
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
8
Nebraska Corn Growers Association

To promote corn and corn products

—
9
Food Bank of Lincoln Inc

The food bank of lincoln, inc. is a nonprofit corporation organized to meet the emergency food needs for the sixteen counties it serves in southeast nebraska.the food bank of lincoln serves as a key organization for receiving, inspecting,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
11
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
12
Nebraska State Afl-Cio

Labor relations

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cambridge Community Daycare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE: $70,000 · OtherCITY OF CAMBRIDGESCHOOL DISTRICT #21 OF FURNAS COUNTY: $69,000 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT #21 OF FURNAS COUNTYCAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $61,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLSCHANCES 4 CHILDREN: $40,000 · OtherCHANCES 4 CHILDRENNEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $40,000 · OtherNEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCILCRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC: $35,000 · OtherCRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INCNEBRASKA LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE SENIOR CENTER INC: $23,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherFLATWATER FREE PRESS NEWSPAPER: $20,000 · Other+13 more: $114,500 · Other+13 moreMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $45,500 · Human ServicesMATT TALBO…FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP…CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE …NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST: $40,000 · Public BenefitNEBRASKA …OPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE: $28,000 · Public BenefitOPENSKY P…NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT: $30,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyLINCOLN ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $10,000 · Crime & LegalHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education
Other$563,500Human Services$71,500Public Benefit$68,000Philanthropy$45,000Arts & Culture$20,000Crime & Legal$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $45,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $40,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT: $30,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE: $28,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNEBRASKA LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetCAMBRIDGE SENIOR CENTER INC: $23,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetLINCOLN ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 86% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetInner City Impact: $9,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds OPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Inner City Impact ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kitty M Perkins FoundationNE28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kitty M Perkins Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Sherwood Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Abel Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Graff Charitable Foundation Inc Co P Mark Graff · Hormel Harris Foundation · James Stuart III Family Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shoemaker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shoemaker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shoemaker Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shoemaker Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shoemaker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph