Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shivshakti Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MEducation$547kReligion$366kArts & Culture$140kInternational$51kHealth$24kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $151k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$961k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAPS CHARITIES INC$1,000,000
BAPS SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA$151,000
Individual grant recipient$21,996
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,422
ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL$7,500
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPARATORY$5,000
BHARTIYA MANDAL FOUNDATION$5,000
RISE AGAINST HUNGER$5,000
BAPS ENDOWMENT INC$1,001
BHAKTI VEDENTAR INSTITUTE$1,000
SALESIAN BOYS CLUB INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($2.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($257k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RELIEF FROM CANCER: $5k → 10%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $1.0M → 8%RELIEF FROM CANCER: $5k → 10%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $35k → 8%RELIEF FROM CANCER: $5k → 10%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $12k → 8%RELIEF FROM CANCER: $4k → 10%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $10k → 8%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $8k → 8%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IA
NJ
CA
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($257k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$257k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 18 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
23

Total granted

$2.2M
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+35%

Still filing today

56%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAPS CHARITIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +15%
  • HH
    HINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT
    3× · 2021–2023 · $126k · revenue +12%
  • UT
    UPTOWN TENDERLOIN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $107k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNIVERSAL WELFARE TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $71k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TD
    T D Singh Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanatana Hindu-Dharma Internat Vedic Awareness

Operating a Hindu Temple and cultural center

Religion
2
Jain United Sangh of Bay Area

Incorporate the innovative and progressive lifestyles of the jain community in the san francisco bay area.

Religion
3
Panchal Association of California Inc

To promote Cultural Awareness

Arts & Culture
4
3RD I South Asian Independent Film

3rd i Films is committed to promoting diverse images of South Asians through independent film. We showcase films from lndia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and the global South Asian Diaspora. To accomplish our mission we organize…

Arts & Culture
5
The Dharma Sanctuary
Religion
6
Sri Veda Vidya Peetham

Hindu temple

Religion
7
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
8
The Raj and Bindu Alla Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Khalsa Foundation

Khalsa foundation california seeks to empower and advocate for the sikh and punjabi communities in the united states, fostering a sense of belonging and promoting holistic well-being through the sikh way of being. we strive to build a…

Religion
10
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
11
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Bharat Sevashram Sangha West Ca

Undertake the responsibility of boosting the moral goal through participation in worship and community development program.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baps Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National First Responders Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAPS CHARITIES INC: $1,065,557 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INC+2 more: $31,500 · Human ServicesBAPS ENDOWMENT INC: $500,816 · OtherBAPS ENDOWMENT INCBAPS SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA: $161,001 · OtherBAPS SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHAIRAIVAN TEMPLE FUND: $73,002 · OtherIRAIVAN TEMPLE FUNDUNIVERSAL WELFARE TRUST: $70,581 · OtherUNIVERSAL WELFARE TRUSTTHE SALVATION ARMY: $35,422 · Other+23 more: $155,783 · Other+23 moreUPTOWN TENDERLOIN INC: $107,000 · Arts & CultureBHARTIYA MANDAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $3,899 · Arts & CultureHINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT: $125,500 · Crime & LegalRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $27,904 · InternationalT D Singh Foundation: $11,001 · InternationalSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Guardsmen: $182 · Youth DevelopmentThe National First Responders Fund: $450 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$1,097,057Other$996,605Arts & Culture$140,899Crime & Legal$125,500International$38,905Youth Development$1,682Public Safety & Disaster$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC: $1,065,557 over 5y, 13% of budgetHINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT: $125,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetUPTOWN TENDERLOIN INC: $107,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetBHARTIYA MANDAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $27,904 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRELIEF FROM CANCER: $19,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCURRY SENIOR CENTER: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetT D Singh Foundation: $11,001 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,048 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe National First Responders Fund: $450 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPeninsula Gujarati Association: $250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Guardsmen: $182 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds UPTOWN TENDERLOIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BHARTIYA MANDAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF FROM CANCER ↗
  • Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds T D Singh Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds The National First Responders Fund ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · The Carl Gellert and Celia Berta Gellert Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shivshakti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shivshakti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shivshakti Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shivshakti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shivshakti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph