Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shirlie & Owen Siegel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$123kHuman Services$94kFood & Nutrition$67kInternational$55kYouth Development$44kReligion$24kHousing & Shelter$22kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
$4,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$32,000
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
FEEDING AMERICA$13,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$13,000
ALL STARS PROJECT$10,000
OLIVE BRANCH MISSION$6,500
COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$4,500
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$4,000
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN$1,500
YOUTH CENTER OF EVANSTON$1,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,000
VINEYARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY$1,000
LEARNING BRIDGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $32k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $13k → 17%COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: $5k → 7%COMMUNITY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $1k → 8%VINEYARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $31k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $13k → 17%COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: $3k → 7%VINEYARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $31k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $12k → 17%VINEYARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 14%HABITAT CHICAGO: $13k → 14%HABITAT CHICAGO: $13k → 14%HABITAT CHICAGO: $12k → 14%HABITAT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $24k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $4k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $4k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $4k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 14%LEARNING BRIDGE: $1k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT: $10k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT: $10k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT: $10k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT: $10k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $13k → 14%HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN: $2k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $13k → 14%HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN: $1k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $12k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $10k → 14%OLIVE BRANCH MISSION: $7k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5k → 14%OLIVE BRANCH MISSION: $6k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4k → 14%OLIVE BRANCH MISSION: $6k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4k → 14%OLIVE BRANCH MISSION: $5k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$476k · 17 repeat orgs$250 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$476k
$250

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $119k · revenue +11%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +20%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • DT
    DARE TO DREAM GET EDUCATED
    one grant, 2021 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
6
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
7
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
12
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $94,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $47,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more: $16,300 · Other+7 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $119,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHFeeding America: $47,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding Americ…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,750 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAG…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NFP: $7,500 · InternationalCOMMUNITY EM…ALL STARS PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureALL STARS…Olive Branch Mission: $23,750 · ReligionCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,250 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $4,200 · Housing & ShelterFREE SPIRIT MEDIA NFP: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$157,800Education$119,250Food & Nutrition$63,250International$55,000Arts & Culture$40,000Religion$23,750Housing & Shelter$19,450Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $119,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $47,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOlive Branch Mission: $23,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NFP: $7,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREE SPIRIT MEDIA NFP: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Olive Branch Mission ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NFP ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FREE SPIRIT MEDIA NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shirlie & Owen Siegel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shirlie & Owen Siegel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shirlie & Owen Siegel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shirlie & Owen Siegel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shirlie & Owen Siegel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph