Skip to content

· Public charity

Shinnyo-En Foundation

Promote global peace through service by nurturing future generations through supporting community-based organizations and educational institutions that promote and engage youth in meaningful acts of service.

$346k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MYouth Development$1.1MReligion$677kInternational$278kPublic Safety & Disaster$209kSocial Science$197kCommunity Improvement$153kPublic Benefit$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $324,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $345,882 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,382 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $318k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL$40,000
YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICE$35,000
BERKELEY CITY COLLEGE$30,000
UC BERKELEY PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER$20,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$20,000
REDWOOD CITY TOGETHER$20,000
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT$20,000
YOUTH IN FOCUS$17,500
BROTHERS ON THE RISE$15,000
CHILD CREATIVITY LAB$15,000
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
INTERFAITH YOUTH ALLIANCE$15,000
THE VOLUNTEER CENTER$15,000
GIRLVENTURES$10,000
PUTNEY SCHOOL SUMMER ARTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EL CENTRO HISPANO: $8k → 9%GIRLVENTURES: $10k → 10%HONEYCOMB PROJECT: $10k → 14%HONEYCOMB PROJECT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Shinnyo-En Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 53%.

Shinnyo-En Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 25 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$3.6M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-21%

Still filing today

76%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +37%
  • SU
    SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $356k · revenue +62%
  • YC
    YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AC
    Avenue Community Development Corporation
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -12%
  • RC
    REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -96%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
4
Community for Youth

Community for youth employs youth mentoring, community building, leadership development, and career exploration to help youth develop relationships that will support their lives, connect with their internal power, and help them make a…

—
5
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
6
Confluence Academy

As a collaborative network of unique schools in an urban setting, confluence develops the whole child by providing experiences that require critical thinking, creativity, and empathy to equip graduates to become leaders in a changing…

Education
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
Yuba River Charter School

Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…

Education
9
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
10
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
15/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Redwood City: $438,750 · OtherCity of Redwood CityREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY: $421,122 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELE…SEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $355,543 · OtherSEATTLE UNIVERSITYPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $181,200 · OtherPUTNEY SCHOOL INC+14 more: $370,638 · Other+14 moreNATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $400,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP …YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $285,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES I…BROTHERS ON THE RISE: $102,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROTHERS ON THE RISETEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICETHINKGIVE INC: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHINKGIVE INC+2 more: $36,100 · Youth DevelopmentGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $405,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERSI…CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $263,265 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITYUnited Roots: $35,000 · EducationHARTFORD INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOR RELIGION AND PEACE: $30,000 · Education+2 more: $22,600 · EducationLevy Family Campus: $66,650 · PhilanthropyVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER CENTER SOUTH BAY-HARBOR- LONG BEACH: $33,600 · PhilanthropyEnvironmental Science Center: $92,500 · EnvironmentSPIRIT SERIES INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureAvenue Community Development Corporation: $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,767,253Youth Development$938,100Education$755,865Philanthropy$300,250Environment$92,500Arts & Culture$88,000Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $405,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $400,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $355,543 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $285,000 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $263,265 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $181,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBROTHERS ON THE RISE: $102,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetEnvironmental Science Center: $92,500 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetLevy Family Campus: $66,650 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSPIRIT SERIES INC: $60,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE: $60,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetTHINKGIVE INC: $55,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHINNYO-EN FOUNDATION: $38,313 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUnited Roots: $35,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER SOUTH BAY-HARBOR- LONG BEACH: $33,600 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHARTFORD INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOR RELIGION AND PEACE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH IN FOCUS: $28,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CREATIVITY LAB: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWHITE PLAINS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCONCRN: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetREDWOOD CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,600 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $7,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE: $7,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW VISION PARTNERS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PUTNEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS ON THE RISE ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Science Center ↗
  • Who funds Levy Family Campus ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT SERIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THINKGIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Avenue Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHINNYO-EN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds United Roots ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER SOUTH BAY-HARBOR- LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOR RELIGION AND PEACE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH IN FOCUS ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CREATIVITY LAB ↗
  • Who funds THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds WHITE PLAINS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCRN ↗
  • Who funds GIRLVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT 59 EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA21.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · The California Endowment · Tides Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shinnyo-En Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shinnyo-En Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shinnyo-En Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Shinnyo-En Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shinnyo-En’s filings →

More from the funding graph