Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shickman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$152kHealth$150kFood & Nutrition$111kArts & Culture$58kInternational$57kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE$20,000
PHILABUNDANCE$10,500
FEEDING AMERICA$10,500
PHILADELPHIA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY$7,500
UJA-FEDERATION OF NY$7,000
JSSA-NETTIE AND MURRAY KAYE FUND$5,500
MAIN LINE HEALTH$5,500
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN$5,000
YELLOW RIBBON FUND$5,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSE$5,000
PATH$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVIC$3,000
PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ANNUAL FUND$2,500
MAYO CLINIC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 22%CITY LIVING: $2k → 20%CITY LIVING: $2k → 20%CITY LIVING: $2k → 20%CITY LIVING: $2k → 20%CITY LIVING: $2k → 20%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Shickman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 29% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Shickman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$501k · 20 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$501k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Philabundance
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +0%
  • Feeding America
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +40%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHEVRA HATZALAH UPPER EAST SIDE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • JS
    JUILLIARD SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • CA
    Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

9
Mjhs Medical Associates Pc

The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to practice the profession of medicine for affiliates of metropolitan jewish health system, inc., which provide medical and health services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $70,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INCMAYO CLINIC — $26,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICMAIN LINE HEALTH INC — $25,500 · HealthMAIN LINE HEALTH INCThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $18,000 · HealthThe Hebrew Home for Aged at …FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $43,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCJSSA-NETTIE AND MURRAY KAYE FUND — $29,500 · OtherJSSA-NETTIE AND MURRAY KAYE FU…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSE — $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL…PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ANNUAL FUND — $11,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ANNUAL …MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN — $10,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCE…CHEVRA HATZALAH UPPER EAST SIDE — $10,000 · OtherCHEVRA HATZALAH UPPER EAST SID…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVIC — $8,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S S…JUILLIARD SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherJUILLIARD SCHOOL+4 more — $13,000 · Other+4 morePhilabundance — $55,500 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceFeeding America — $55,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $43,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOW RIB…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEW…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $30,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN …Philadelphia Chamber Music Society — $16,500 · Arts & CulturePhiladelp…PATH — $42,000 · InternationalCITY LIVING NY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $7,500 · Human Services
Health$140,000Other$149,500Food & Nutrition$111,000Philanthropy$50,000Arts & Culture$46,500International$42,000Human Services$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPhilabundance — $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $43,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPATH — $42,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $26,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN LINE HEALTH INC — $25,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPhiladelphia Chamber Music Society — $16,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY LIVING NY INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds Philabundance
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC
  • Who funds PATH
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds MAIN LINE HEALTH INC
  • Who funds The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale
  • Who funds Philadelphia Chamber Music Society
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds CITY LIVING NY INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shickman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shickman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Shickman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph