Skip to content

· Public charity

Sherman Service League

To foster interest among its members in the social, economic, educa- tional cultural and civic comditions of the community and to encourage members to use their volunteer time effectively in service to t

$115k
Granted FY2019
11
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Human Services$91kHousing & Shelter$44kYouth Development$44kCrime & Legal$36kFood & Nutrition$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kArts & Culture$7kHealth$7k
02FY2019 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $83,834, the rows itemized in this filing. The $115,024 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,190 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grand Central St$9,000
Crisis Center$8,000
House of Eli$8,000
Grayson Co Child$8,000
Masterkey Minist$8,000
Grayson Co Welfa$8,000
Boys& Girls Club$7,500
Family Promise$7,500
Locust Fire Dep$7,000
Habitat Humanity$6,834
North Tx Youth C$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Masterkey Minist: $9k → 11%Masterkey Minist: $8k → 11%Grayson Co Welfa: $9k → 11%Grayson Co Welfa: $9k → 11%Four Rivers Outr: $8k → 11%Grayson Co Welfa: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$209k · 10 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$209k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+15%

Still filing today

90%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +55%
  • GC
    Grayson County Welfare Board Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $26k · revenue +14%
  • GG
    GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +205%

Funded once

  • WV
    WESLEY VILLAGE RETIREMENT HOME INC
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +7%
  • FR
    FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • DP
    DENISON PERFORMING ARTS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Grayson County Inc

CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) of Grayson County is a non-profit organization dedicated to training and equipping our community to protect children, empower families, and advocate for positive outcomes for children involved in…

Civil Rights
2
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
3
Gilmer County Family Connection Commission

To provide children, family and social services to the community of gilmer county.

Human Services
4
Graham County Rehabilitaion Center Inc

Provides support and services to individuals from 5 years to seniors with developmental disabilities and/or phsyical limitations.

Human Services
5
Opportunity House of Greene County Inc

Homeless shelter that provides temporary lodging

Human Services
6
Grace House Texarkana Inc

Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.

Housing & Shelter
7
The Gentry House Inc

The gentry house, inc. is an emergency transitional homeless shelter to help families with children in the region of murray and calloway county, ky. residents are given rent and utility assistance.

—
8
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
10
Home On the Green Pastures

Providing the shelter and counseling for the abused women and children

Human Services
11
Southeast Grayson Senior Center

Senior Center facility for the local Meals on Wheels production.

Human Services
12
Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc

Providing facilities related to the investigation and treatment of victims of child abuse and to provide education and coordination to child abuse prevention efforts by various organizations in Garfield County, OK.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grayson County Juvenile Alternatives Inc North Texas Youth Connection; the most unlike its peers is Locust Community Volunteer Fire Dep. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INC: $23,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INCGRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTION: $21,300 · OtherGRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES …HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL GRAYSON COUNTY: $12,834 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL GR…WESLEY VILLAGE RETIREMENT HOME INC: $8,500 · OtherWESLEY VILLAGE RETIREMENT HOME INCLOCUST COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEP: $7,000 · OtherLOCUST COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPDENISON PERFORMING ARTS INC: $6,500 · OtherDENISON PERFORMING ARTS INCHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $6,500 · OtherHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INCGrayson County Welfare Board Inc: $25,500 · Human ServicesGrayson County Welfare Board In…Grayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc: $22,000 · Human ServicesGrayson County Women's Crisis L…MASTERKEY MINISTRIES OF GRAYSON COUNTY: $17,000 · Human ServicesMASTERKEY MINISTRIES OF GRAYSON…FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesFOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INCGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRAYSON COUN…GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION: $24,800 · Food & NutritionGRAYSON GR…FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAYSON COUNTY: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PRO…HOUSE OF ELI INC: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF E…CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $20,000 · HealthVOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL OF TEXOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $6,000 · Religion
Other$85,634Human Services$72,500Youth Development$28,000Food & Nutrition$24,800Housing & Shelter$23,000Health$20,000Religion$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $28,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGrayson County Welfare Board Inc: $25,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INC: $23,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGrayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc: $22,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTION: $21,300 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMASTERKEY MINISTRIES OF GRAYSON COUNTY: $17,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAYSON COUNTY: $15,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL GRAYSON COUNTY: $12,834 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWESLEY VILLAGE RETIREMENT HOME INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE OF ELI INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · United Way of Grayson County Inc · Texoma Medical Center Volunteers · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · Texoma Community Foundation · Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · Children's Clinic of Sherman · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · Harry H Gibson Family Foundation · North Texas Food Bank

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sherman Service League funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sherman Service League. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sherman Service League?

    Find your warmest path to Sherman Service League through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sherman Service League’s filings →

    More from the funding graph