Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$801k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Community Improvement$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.1MEnvironment$605kRecreation & Sports$399kArts & Culture$302kHuman Services$266kPublic Benefit$134kEducation$129kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $643k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE & DELAWARE COUNTY INC$240,000
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC$140,100
MUNCIE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$85,000
MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP$67,000
CARDINAL GREENWAY INC$60,000
RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY$51,000
URBAN LIGHT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$47,000
ROSS COMMUNITY CENTER$24,000
HALTEMAN VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION$20,000
ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS$13,000
WHITELY COMMUNITY COUNCIL$10,765
MINNETRISTA CULTURAL CENTER$7,500
CONSERVATION LAW CENTER$5,000
STRONG CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$5,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $25k → 15%ROSS COMMUNITY CENTER: $87k → 19%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $68k → 7%ROSS COMMUNITY CENTER: $55k → 19%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $58k → 7%MUNCIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50k → 19%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $56k → 7%GREATER MUNCIE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50k → 19%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $53k → 7%GREATER MUNCIE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $43k → 19%URBAN LIGHT COMMUNITY: $36k → 19%8TWELVE COALITION: $25k → 19%TOWN OF ALBANY: $60k → 19%IVY TECH FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $84k → 19%HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $25k → 16%HALTEMAN VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC: $26k → 19%HALTEMAN VILLAGE: $25k → 19%BALL STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $466k → 19%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $332k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE & DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $285k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE & DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $285k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE & DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $240k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE & DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $216k → 19%CARDINAL GREENWAY INC: $165k → 19%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $140k → 19%RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY: $111k → 19%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $105k → 19%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $104k → 19%MUNCIE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $85k → 19%COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $81k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE & DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $68k → 19%MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $67k → 19%CARDINAL GREENWAY INC: $60k → 19%RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY: $51k → 19%MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 19%MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 19%MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 19%CITY OF MUNCIE: $40k → 19%CITY OF MUNCIE: $34k → 19%RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY: $32k → 19%CITY OF MUNCIE: $30k → 19%CARDINAL GREENWAY INC: $30k → 19%CITY OF MUNCIE: $30k → 19%DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $28k → 19%RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY: $27k → 19%RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 100%.

Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 22 repeat orgs$555k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$3.0M
$490k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+19%

Still filing today

64%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +91% · 60% of their budget
  • MD
    MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEV PARTNERSHIP
    7× · 2018–2025 · $254k · revenue +61%
  • RL
    RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $253k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muncie Sports Commission Inc

The muncie sports commission exists to attract, create, host, and support sporting events and recreational opportunities for delaware county, indiana.

Recreation & Sports
2
Muncie-Delaware County Chamber of Commerce

To be an action-oriented, visionary organization which will stimulate progress, foster economic growth and enhance individual opportunity to achieve a high quality of life for everyone.

—
3
Visit Muncie Inc

To develop and promote development and growth of the convention, recreation and visitor industry in the county of delaware, state of indiana.

Community Improvement
4
Muncie Land Bank Inc

Aid in the economic revitalization of muncie indiana through securing land for housing initiatives and urban renewal

Community Improvement
5
Arts Council of Southern Indiana

To encourage the involvement and education of the general public in the local area in the active participation in the arts.

—
6
Indiana Innovation Council Inc

Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.

—
7
Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated

The central indiana land trust, inc. preserves the best of central indiana's natural areas, protecting plants and animals, so hoosiers can experience the wonder of the state's natural heritage.

Environment
8
Morgan County Economic Development

The purpose is to promote and develop economic expansion within morgan county, indiana.

—
9
Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art Inc

Provides contemporary art exhibitions and programs to the community that are aesthetically compelling, conceptually rigorous, and socially impactful.

—
10
Bridges Community Services Inc

To develop, coordinate, and proivde housing, social services, and educational programs for low income and moderate income residents of muncie, indiana.

—
11
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
12
Chamber of Commerce of Harrison County

Support our members and the business environment by fostering economic and community development initiatives to improve the quality of life in harrison county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whitely Community Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $1,331,625 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INCCARDINAL GREENWAY INC: $308,020 · Recreation & SportsCARDINAL GREENWAY INC+1 more: $13,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE AND DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $1,110,450 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $265,800 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCITY OF MUNCIE-MAYOR'S OFFICE: $134,000 · OtherCITY OF MUNCIE-MAYOR'S OF…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC: $100,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS…GREATER MUNCIE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $99,000 · OtherGREATER MUNCIE HABITAT FO…Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…MUNCIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50,000 · OtherMINNETRISTA CULTURAL CENTER: $48,500 · OtherHALTEMAN VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC: $45,500 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER KING DREAM TEAM: $37,000 · OtherURBAN LIGHT CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $47,000 · Other+14 more: $214,000 · Other+14 moreMUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEV PARTNERSHIP: $254,000 · Community ImprovementWHITELY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $35,765 · Community Improvement+1 more: $8,555 · Community ImprovementRED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $253,136 · EnvironmentHoosier Environmental Council Inc: $25,000 · EnvironmentROSS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $165,700 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationEarlham College Inc: $26,466 · EducationBall State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $4,000 · EducationMUNCIE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $95,000 · Arts & CultureDELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $43,700 · Arts & CultureORCHESTRA INDIANA INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureINDIANA STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11,500 · Arts & CultureMUNCIE ARTS & CULTURE COUNCIL INC: $11,000 · Arts & Culture
Recreation & Sports$1,652,645Philanthropy$1,110,450Other$1,100,800Community Improvement$298,320Environment$278,136Education$271,166Arts & Culture$195,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC: $1,331,625 over 8y, 60% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE AND DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $1,110,450 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetCARDINAL GREENWAY INC: $308,020 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $265,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEV PARTNERSHIP: $254,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetRED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $253,136 over 7y, 12% of budgetROSS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $165,700 over 3y, 12% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUNCIE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $43,700 over 8y, 10% of budgetWHITELY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $35,765 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEarlham College Inc: $26,466 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHoosier Environmental Council Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORCHESTRA INDIANA INC: $23,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCORNERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $18,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINDIANA STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUNCIE ARTS & CULTURE COUNCIL INC: $11,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetMUNCIE ACTION PLAN INC: $8,555 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetMOTIVATE OUR MINDS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUNCIE AND DELAWARE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GREENWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MUNCIE DOWNTOWN DEV PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNCIE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LIGHT CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITELY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Earlham College Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hoosier Environmental Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ball State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORCHESTRA INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MUNCIE ARTS & CULTURE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNCIE ACTION PLAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ball Brothers FoundationIN45.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ball Brothers Foundation · George and Frances Ball Foundation · The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc · Mutualbank Charitable Foundation Inc · Hamer D & Phyllis C Shafer Foundation Charitable Trust · Heart of Indiana United Way Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Muncie Endurathon Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Edmund F and Virginia B Ball Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph