· Private foundation
Sherbrooke Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANOMET INC | $7,000 |
| ST PAUL'S CHURCH DEDHAM | $6,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM | $5,000 |
| BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| PIONEER INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| NEW BEDFORD MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS | $5,000 |
| WGBH | $5,000 |
| TABOR ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| GRUBSTREET INC | $4,000 |
| SOUTHHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME | $4,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $4,000 |
| SOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY CENTER | $4,000 |
| BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
73 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GRUB STREET INC9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +90%- PIPIONEER INSTITUTE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +117%
- MIMANOMET INC7× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- TITHOMPSON ISLAND OUTWARD BOUNDone grant, 2019 · $5k
- THTHE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +185%
- CRCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Whitehead institute forges new frontiers in science, uncovering insights today that unlock the potential of tomorrow. our advances in genetics and genomics are now enabling us to tackle the complexities of life with unprecedented depth and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlands Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grampy's Charities James Jonatha William Castle Ttees. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRUB STREET INC ↗
- Who funds PIONEER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds MANOMET INC ↗
- Who funds HALE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Compassionate Care ALS Inc ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds DERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Cohasset Local Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME ↗
- Who funds VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Taniguchi Deane Family Foundation · South Shore Playhouse Associates Inc · Fiduciary Charitable Foundation Dba Fiduciary Trust Charitable · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Pilgrim Bank Foundation · Haven Trust · Abington Bank Community Foundation Inc F/K/A Envision Bank Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sherbrooke Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Boston Harbor Now Inc — 45% of income from government
- Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc — 40% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Brookview House Inc — 34% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Journey Forward Inc — 20% of income from government
- Hull Lifesaving Museum Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Manomet Inc — 12% of income from government
- Sea Education Association Inc — 12% of income from government
- Rehearsal for Life Inc — 11% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Rogerson Communities Inc — 6% of income from government
- Wildlands Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- South Shore Art Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Grub Street Inc — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wellspring Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Baptist Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Friends of Holly Hill Farm Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of Mvyradio Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Epiphany School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sherbrooke Family Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Sherbrooke Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.