Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shema Yisrael Inc

TO SUPPORT AND ENHANCE THE SPIRITUAL, EDUCATIONAL, PHYSICAL AND MATERIAL WELL BEING OF THOSE IN NEED.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$451kHuman Services$11kHealth$10kEducation$10kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPhilanthropy$900Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION LEV SIMCHA$72,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CONGREGATION MIDRASH SHMUEL$5,000
TZEDAKA CENTER MIAMI$3,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHEMA YISRAEL INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$507k · 5 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$507k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+40%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CONGREGATION LEV SIMCHA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $385k
  • AS
    AVENTURA SHUL CORP
    3× · 2019–2023 · $55k
  • SI
    SHUVA ISRAEL AVENTURA INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $42k

Funded once

  • MJ
    ME-YAD JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM CHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +102%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • SY
    SHEMA YISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Even Hatorah of Aventura Inc

The organization provides educational services to jewish families, teachers, scholars and rabbis. additionally, we provide the community outreach services, offer counseling services, spiritual guidance, financial assistance to jewish…

Religion
3
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
4
Tov Vachesed Inc

To provide food baskets for the poor on the jewish holidays

International
5
The Neshamah Institute Inc

Neshamah provides jewish education,religious services,life cycle

Religion
6
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
7
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
8
Miami Torah Center Inc

To inspire and engage jews of all ages and backgrounds to develop and expand themselves through the study of the bible.

—
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Yam Hatalmud of Florida Inc

Jewish outreach and education services

Religion
11
Batay Avoth of Ponevez Yeshiva Inc

Currently inactive, in past - help schools and orphanages in israel

—
12
Devar Emet Messianic Jewish Outreach Inc

N/a

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Netive Ezra Corp; the most unlike its peers is Lifequest Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION LEV SIMCHA: $385,000 · OtherCONGREGATION LEV SIMCHAAVENTURA SHUL CORP: $55,000 · OtherAVENTURA SHUL CORPSHUVA ISRAEL AVENTURA INC: $42,210 · OtherSHUVA ISRAEL AVENTURA INC+10 more: $55,500 · Other+10 moreME-YAD JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM CHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH INC: $15,000 · ReligionNETIVE EZRA CORP: $1,030 · Religion+1 more: $150 · ReligionSHEMA YISRAEL INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIFEQUEST FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthYESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC: $9,850 · EducationYITAV LEV CHARITY INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,800 · Public Safety & DisasterNETIVOS OLAM: $900 · Philanthropy
Other$537,710Religion$16,180Human Services$10,000Health$10,000Education$9,850Housing & Shelter$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,800Philanthropy$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetME-YAD JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM CHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHEMA YISRAEL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetYESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC: $9,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYITAV LEV CHARITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETIVE EZRA CORP: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETIVOS OLAM: $900 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE KESHER CONNECTION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ME-YAD JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM CHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEMA YISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEQUEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds YITAV LEV CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NETIVE EZRA CORP ↗
  • Who funds NETIVOS OLAM ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER CONNECTION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY19.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shema Yisrael Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shema Yisrael Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shema Yisrael Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Shema Yisrael Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shema Yisrael’s filings →

    More from the funding graph