Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shelley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$131kReligion$128kHealth$93kInternational$71kRecreation & Sports$54kArts & Culture$38kFood & Nutrition$28kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$802k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVEN GROUND INC$20,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC$15,000
AERIAL EQUANIMITY$13,000
CHABAD OF NORTHERN NEVADA INC$12,000
BORN TO ACT PLAYERS$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
FOODCYCLE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 53% of Shelley Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 18% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 8%.

Shelley Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$490k · 11 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$490k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+36%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +64%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +89%
  • F
    FOODCYCLE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $28k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • BJ
    BOYSTOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $41k
  • DIRECT RELIEFgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +94%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev

Equalize Health believes in a world where we all have access to world-class medical treatment, no matter where we live. Millions of people suffer and die from preventable or treatable conditions simply because they dont have access to the…

Science & Tech
4
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
5
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
6
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
7
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
8
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
9
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
10
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth's mission is to empower everyone, everywhere, with the knowledge, inspiration, and opportunity to heal the Earth and reclaim our future.

Environment
11
Engenderhealth Inc

Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)

International
12
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Heart Worldwide; the most unlike its peers is Flux Theatre Ensemble Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF NORTHERN NEVADA INC: $66,500 · OtherCHABAD OF NORTHERN NEVADA INCAERIAL EQUANIMITY: $53,500 · OtherAERIAL EQUANIMITYBOYSTOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION: $41,300 · OtherBOYSTOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATIONBORN TO ACT PLAYERS CORP: $30,500 · OtherBORN TO ACT PLAYERS CORPIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE WHALEMAN FOUNDATION: $13,000 · OtherUNITARIAN CHURCH STUDIO CITY: $10,000 · OtherMETANOIA PEACE COMMUNITY-CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherPARENTS OF MURDERED CHILDREN: $9,000 · Other+4 more: $16,000 · Other+4 moreEVEN GROUND INC: $131,000 · EducationEVEN GROUND INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $80,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH…SERENITYSTAR: $8,000 · HealthSERENITYSTARMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $46,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…DIRECT RELIEF: $20,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIE…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATE…FOODCYCLE: $28,000 · Food & NutritionAwaken INC: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $7,500 · Human ServicesFLUX THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$268,800Education$131,000Health$88,000International$71,000Food & Nutrition$28,000Housing & Shelter$24,000Human Services$7,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVEN GROUND INC: $131,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $46,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOODCYCLE: $28,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetAwaken INC: $24,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERENITYSTAR: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERAWORKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLUX THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVEN GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODCYCLE ↗
  • Who funds Awaken INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds SERENITYSTAR ↗
  • Who funds ONE HEART WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds OPERAWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds FLUX THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shelley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shelley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shelley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shelley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shelley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph