Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$173kRecreation & Sports$125kEmployment$73kReligion$53kCommunity Improvement$20kYouth Development$18kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Univ of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund$10,000
Univ of MD College Park Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Drexel University$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Liberty University$5,000
George Washington University$5,000
University of Central Florida$5,000
DC Student Construction Trades Foundation$5,000
George Mason University$5,000
ABC CraftMasters Training Trust$5,000
University of MD$5,000
East Carolina University$5,000
Towson University$5,000
Univ of MD College Park Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%Mount Aloysius College: $5k → 16%Drexel University: $8k → 22%DC STUDENT CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%University of Central Florida: $5k → 13%East Carolina University: $5k → 20%PHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%George Mason University: $5k → 6%Roanoke College: $5k → 8%ASA Metro Washington: $8k → 9%Liberty University: $5k → 20%HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 6%HARFORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%College of Southern MD: $5k → 8%BETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $5k → 8%CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE: $5k → 10%UMD Global Campus: $10k → 11%Towson University: $5k → 11%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%DC Student Construction Trades Foundation: $8k → 14%Eastern Carolina University: $5k → 20%PHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 4%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%ROANOKE COLLEGE: $5k → 8%AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF METRO WASHINGTON: $5k → 9%Univ of MD Office of Student Fin Svcs: $15k → 11%Towson University: $5k → 11%DC Student Construction Trades Foundation: $5k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%TEMPLE ISAIAH: $5k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $15k → 11%MARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION & INNOVATION: $5k → 11%DC STUDENT CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Univ of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund: $10k → 11%DC STUDENT CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Univ of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund: $10k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGT: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB: $10k → 11%George Washington University: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB IMPACT FUND: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOLARS: $9k → 11%University of MD: $5k → 11%ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST: $10k → 11%UNIV OF MD COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%UNIV OF MD COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%Univ of MD College Park Foundation: $10k → 11%UNIV OF MD COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%Univ of MD College Park Foundation: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$315k · 16 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$315k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+16%

Still filing today

31%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +72%
  • AC
    ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +124%
  • RC
    ROANOKE COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UO
    Univ of MD Office of Student Fin Svcs
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
5
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The George Washington University; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherPHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONUniv of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund: $20,000 · OtherUniv of MD Terrapin Club Impact FundUniv of MD Office of Student Fin Svcs: $15,000 · OtherUniv of MD Office of Student Fin SvcsUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDGeorge Mason University: $15,000 · OtherGeorge Mason UniversityTEMPLE ISAIAH: $14,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $14,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI TZEDEK: $12,600 · OtherCHABAD OF UPPER MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $12,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB IMPACT FUND: $10,000 · OtherSHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB: $10,000 · OtherTowson University: $10,000 · OtherAce Mentor Program - Greater Washington: $9,500 · Other+13 more: $69,300 · Other+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE …ROANOKE COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGEDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION: $5,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $5,000 · EducationMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS: $4,500 · EducationDC STUDENTS CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · EmploymentDC STUDENTS CO…ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST: $30,000 · EmploymentABC CRAFTMASTE…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $5,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,600 · Civil Rights
Other$269,500Education$132,000Employment$62,500International$5,000Civil Rights$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDC STUDENTS CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST: $30,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF METRO WASHINGTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS: $4,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DC STUDENTS CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF METRO WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Maryland Center for Construction Education and Innovation: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sheldon Shapiro’s filings →

More from the funding graph