Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$173kRecreation & Sports$125kEmployment$73kReligion$53kCommunity Improvement$20kYouth Development$18kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Univ of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund$10,000
Univ of MD College Park Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Drexel University$7,500
University of MD$5,000
East Carolina University$5,000
ABC CraftMasters Training Trust$5,000
DC Student Construction Trades Foundation$5,000
George Washington University$5,000
Towson University$5,000
University of Central Florida$5,000
Univ of MD College Park Foundation$5,000
Liberty University$5,000
George Mason University$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%Mount Aloysius College: $5k → 16%Drexel University: $8k → 22%DC STUDENT CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%University of Central Florida: $5k → 13%Eastern Carolina University: $5k → 20%PHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%George Mason University: $5k → 6%Roanoke College: $5k → 8%ASA Metro Washington: $8k → 9%Liberty University: $5k → 20%HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 6%HARFORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%College of Southern MD: $5k → 8%BETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $5k → 8%CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE: $5k → 10%UMD Global Campus: $10k → 11%Towson University: $5k → 11%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%DC Student Construction Trades Foundation: $8k → 14%East Carolina University: $5k → 20%PHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 4%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%ROANOKE COLLEGE: $5k → 8%AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF METRO WASHINGTON: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $15k → 11%Towson University: $5k → 11%DC STUDENT CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%TEMPLE ISAIAH: $5k → 6%Univ of MD Office of Student Fin Svcs: $15k → 11%MARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION & INNOVATION: $5k → 11%DC Student Construction Trades Foundation: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB: $10k → 11%DC STUDENT CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Univ of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund: $10k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGT: $5k → 14%Univ of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund: $10k → 11%George Washington University: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB IMPACT FUND: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOLARS: $9k → 11%University of MD: $5k → 11%ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST: $10k → 11%UNIV OF MD COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%UNIV OF MD COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%Univ of MD College Park Foundation: $10k → 11%Univ of MD College Park Foundation: $10k → 11%UNIV OF MD COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$315k · 16 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$315k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+16%

Still filing today

31%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +72%
  • AC
    ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +124%
  • RC
    ROANOKE COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UO
    Univ of MD Office of Student Fin Svcs
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
5
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The George Washington University and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $22,500 · OtherPHCC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONUniv of MD Terrapin Club Impact Fund — $20,000 · OtherUniv of MD Terrapin Club Impact FundUniv of MD Office of Student Fin Svcs — $15,000 · OtherUniv of MD Office of Student Fin SvcsGeorge Mason University — $15,000 · OtherGeorge Mason UniversityUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDBETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION — $14,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISAIAH — $14,000 · OtherCHABAD OF UPPER MONTGOMERY COUNTY — $12,600 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI TZEDEK — $12,600 · OtherTowson University — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB IMPACT FUND — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherSHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherAce Mentor Program - Greater Washington — $9,500 · Other+13 more — $69,300 · Other+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE …ROANOKE COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGEDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $7,500 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYThe George Washington University — $5,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 · EducationMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION — $5,000 · EducationACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS — $4,500 · EducationDC STUDENTS CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION INC — $32,500 · EmploymentDC STUDENTS CO…ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST — $30,000 · EmploymentABC CRAFTMASTE…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON — $5,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $3,600 · Civil Rights
Other$269,500Education$132,000Employment$62,500International$5,000Civil Rights$3,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDC STUDENTS CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION INC — $32,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST — $30,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF METRO WASHINGTON — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS — $4,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DC STUDENTS CONSTRUCTION TRADES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ABC CRAFTMASTERS TRAINING TRUST
  • Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON
  • Who funds The George Washington University
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF METRO WASHINGTON
  • Who funds MOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE
  • Who funds MARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION
  • Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 29%
  • Maryland Center for Construction Education and Innovation29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sheldon Shapiro Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph