Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sheehan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$241k
Granted FY2024still arriving
55
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$329kHuman Services$144kArts & Culture$132kYouth Development$95kRecreation & Sports$92kEnvironment$82kHousing & Shelter$75kPhilanthropy$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k45 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $146k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$728k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKING THE BOAT$40,000
EAGLES WINGS$25,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$10,500
SAVE THE SOUND$10,000
ONE CHANCE TO GROW UP$10,000
HORIZON FOR HOMELESS$10,000
MILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION$10,000
STEM ALLIANCE$10,000
SAVE THE SOUND$10,000
FIELDS FOR KIDS PROGRAM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CAPE COD COMMUNITY FISH$5,000
YMCA OF NORTHSHORE$5,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$5,000
CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATRE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $3k → 8%MICHAEL E THORNTON FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%NEW BELGIUM COWORKER ASSISTANCE FUND: $5k → 11%MICHAEL E THORNTON FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%KEYS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%KEYS CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%YMCA OF NORTHSHORE: $5k → 10%KEYS CHILDRENS FOUNDATIONS: $5k → 13%YMCA OF NORTHSHORE: $5k → 10%YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE: $5k → 10%KEYS CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$708k · 43 repeat orgs$336k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
40

Total granted

$708k
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+34%

Still filing today

26%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +19%
  • SA
    STEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CT
    CONTRIBUTION TO COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • LW
    LITTLE WOMEN'S FUND OF GR MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • GT
    Grant to Jones River Watershed Association
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
2
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
3
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
7
Wisconsin Conservatory of Music Inc

Inspiring individuals and communities through exceptional music education, accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
9
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment
10
Milwaukee Public Museum Inc

The milwaukee public museum inspires curiosity, excites minds and increases desire to preserve and protect our world's natural and cultural diversity through exhibitions, educational programs, collections and research.

Arts & Culture
11
Fund for Lake Michigan Inc

Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…

Environment
12
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation Inc

Massachusetts taxpayers foundation provides public & private sector decision makers with accurate, timely, unbiased research & constructive solutions that drive public policy in order to strengthen the state's finances & position the…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee; the most unlike its peers is Stem Alliance of Larchmont- Mamaroneck Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANT TO ROCKING THE BOAT: $130,000 · OtherGRANT TO ROCKING THE BOATGrant to First Stage Children's Theater: $51,000 · OtherGrant to First Stage Children's TheaterGRANT TO WISCONSIN STATE FAIR PARK FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherGRANT TO WISCONSIN STATE FAIR PARK FOUNDATIONGRANT TO CARE2COMMUNITIES: $47,250 · OtherGRANT TO CARE2COMMUNITIESGrant to the Boys & Girls Club of Brockton: $40,000 · OtherGRANT TO LITTLE WOMEN'S FUND OF GR MILWAUKEE: $33,180 · OtherCONTRIBUTION TO NOTRE DAME MIDDLE SCHOOL: $30,000 · Other+85 more: $436,269 · Other+85 moreROCKING THE BOAT INC: $80,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT100 GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesNEW BELGIUM COWORKER ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MICHAEL E THORNTON FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSAVE THE SOUND: $20,000 · EnvironmentMILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentHARWICH CONSERVATION TRUST: $10,000 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $650 · Arts & CultureOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · PhilanthropySTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$817,699Education$80,500Human Services$56,500Environment$40,500Arts & Culture$28,650Philanthropy$27,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKING THE BOAT INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $25,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHARWICH CONSERVATION TRUST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT100 GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW BELGIUM COWORKER ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MICHAEL E THORNTON FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJunior League of Milwaukee: $2,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN TREE GARDEN CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPI BETA PHI FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN MUSEUM OF QUILTS & FIBER ARTS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKING THE BOAT INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds STEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARWICH CONSERVATION TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sheehan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sheehan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Ymca of the North Shore Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sheehan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph