Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shaw Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$244kEducation$148kHuman Services$91kScience & Tech$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$62kHealth$29kEnvironment$17kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWNMENT ASSOCI$16,250
EXPLORATION PLACE$8,500
UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WITCHITA$7,000
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$6,400
MUSIC THEATER OF WICHITA$6,000
WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY$6,000
PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTE$5,000
ORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE$5,000
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$5,000
BOTANICA$5,000
SEDGEWICK COUNTY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$5,000
KANSAS AVIATION MUSEUM$2,750
TRINITY CATHOLIC JRSR HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL AND ACADEMIC$2,500
ST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF RENO COUNTY: $1k → 15%RIDING FOR A REASON: $500 → 12%HOSPICE OF RENO COUNTY: $1k → 15%HOSPICE OF RENO COUNTY: $400 → 15%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$690k · 28 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
17

Total granted

$690k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+29%

Still filing today

64%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EXPLORATION PLACE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +187%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +99%
  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • SC
    SEDGWICK COUNTY ZOO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • KC
    KANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
2
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
3
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
4
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
5
Kansas National Education Association

To advocate for education professionals and to unite our members, kansans, and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

—
6
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
7
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
8
Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

Out vision is: all communities across kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.

Environment
9
Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc

Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.

Education
10
Wichita Area Sexual Assault Center Inc

Wichita area sexual assault center works with individuals and communities through comprehensive services and education to create a culture of intolerance for sexual violence and an atmosphere of healing for those impacted by it.

Health
11
The Kansas Learning Center for Health Inc

Health education & museum.

—
12
Jefferson County Memorial Hospital Inc

Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
27/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WICHITA INC: $66,702 · OtherUNION RESCUE MISSION OF WICHITA INCMUSIC THEATER OF WICHITA: $66,700 · OtherMUSIC THEATER OF WICHITAKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWNMENT ASSOCI: $53,750 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWNMENT ASSOCIKU ENDOWMENT - WICHITA: $49,800 · OtherKU ENDOWMENT - WICHITATHE SALVATION ARMY: $23,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTE: $19,634 · OtherPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTETRINITY CATHOLIC JRSR HIGH SCHOOL: $12,600 · Other+18 more: $54,266 · Other+18 moreEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $75,220 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INCWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $58,200 · Arts & CultureWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETYWichita Art Museum Inc: $50,500 · Arts & CultureWichita Art Museum IncORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD: $50,321 · Arts & CultureORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTDMARK ARTS INC: $8,400 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $6,018 · Arts & CultureTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $54,200 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF RENO COUNTY INC: $2,400 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $21,000 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationREADY READERS: $1,700 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationBOTANICA INC: $16,600 · EnvironmentST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS: $8,300 · HealthTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE COMFORT CREW FOR MILITARY KIDS: $1,000 · HealthCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $766 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $500 · HealthSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsHUTCHINSON FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC: $3,600 · AnimalsStray Rescue of St Louis: $600 · Animals
Other$346,952Arts & Culture$248,659Human Services$57,100Education$33,200Environment$16,600Health$11,566Animals$9,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $75,220 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $58,200 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $54,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWichita Art Museum Inc: $50,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD: $50,321 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBOTANICA INC: $16,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $8,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS: $8,300 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS AVIATION MUSEUM INC: $6,018 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH INC: $3,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $3,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUTCHINSON FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC: $3,600 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF RENO COUNTY INC: $2,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS HONOR FLIGHT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADY READERS: $1,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMFORT CREW FOR MILITARY KIDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $766 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $766 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES CARE INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStray Rescue of St Louis: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLutheran Elementary School Association: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDING FOR A REASON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS AVIATION MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds HUTCHINSON FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF RENO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMFORT CREW FOR MILITARY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Ima Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Annie Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Wichita Foundation · DeVore Foundation Inc · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Garvey Kansas Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shaw Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shaw Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shaw Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shaw Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shaw Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph