Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Sharp Health Plan

To promote the health and to serve the community interests of the residents of California, by operation of a health maintenance organization and by provision of other managed health care services.

$62k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$10MYouth Development$113kFood & Nutrition$71kArts & Culture$68kCommunity Improvement$55kEducation$20kPublic Benefit$15kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $7,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $61,738 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $54,238 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$331M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
San Diego Food Bank$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: $15k → 10%HEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: $10k → 11%Sharp Healthcare Foundation: $4.0M → 11%HEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: $10k → 11%SHARP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $4.0M → 11%SHARP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 11%SHARP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%Sharp HealthCare Foundation: $15k → 11%SHARP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10k → 11%GROSSMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%GROSSMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%ASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 11%Asian Business Association: $6k → 11%ASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%San Diego Second Chance: $5k → 11%Girl Scouts SDIMP Council Inc: $25k → 11%GIRLS SCOUTS SDIMP COUNCIL INC: $20k → 11%GIRL SCOUTS SDIMP COUNCIL INC: $15k → 11%GIRL SCOUTS SDIMP COUNCIL INC: $15k → 11%Girl Scouts SDimp Council Inc: $15k → 11%GIRL SCOUTS SDIMP COUNCIL INC: $15k → 11%Girl Scouts San DiegoImperial Council Inc: $8k → 11%San Diego Food Bank: $15k → 11%San Diego Food Bank: $15k → 11%SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $8k → 11%San Diego Food Bank: $8k → 11%San Diego Food Bank: $6k → 11%San Diego North Chamber of Commerce: $18k → 11%SAN DIEGO NORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 11%San Diego North Chamber of Commerce: $7k → 11%PALOMAR HEALTH: $11k → 11%Grossmont Hospital Foundation: $6k → 11%PACIFIC ART MOVEMENT: $32k → 11%PACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT: $13k → 11%PACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT: $12k → 11%Pacific Art Movement: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against -23% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$10M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
-23%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Sharp Healthcare Foundation
    6× · 2017–2023 · $10M · revenue +60%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $113k · revenue +14%
  • PA
    PACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT
    4× · 2017–2020 · $68k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • PH
    PALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue -43%
  • SD
    San Diego Food System Alliancegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +99%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO SECOND CHANCE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

2
San Diego Municipal Employees Assn

The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…

3
Building Industry Association of San Diego

The mission of the building industry association of san diego is to proactively promote a positive business environment for the land development, home building and commercial development industry throughout san diego county.

4
San Diego County Bar Association

The mission of the san diego county bar association is to be the representative of the san diego county legal profession, serving the prblic and the profession by enhancing the legal system and promoting justice, professional excellence,…

5
San Diego Housing Federation

The Federation brings together representatives of affordable housing community development corporations with others interested in the development and management of housing for low and moderate income persons in San Diego County to mutually…

Education
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
Sharp Coronado Hospital & Healthcare Center

To operate and maintain a general acute care hospital and related facilities for the acute care of persons suffering from illnesses or disabilities, and for the continuing care of persons needing rehabilitation and the custodial care of…

8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
San Diegans for Health Care Coverage

Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans

Health
10
San Diego County Credit Union

A not-for-profit credit union wholly owned by its members

11
Greater San Diego Business Association Inc

Business ownership, workforce equality & supportive consumerism; creating prosperity to support equality, diversity & inclusion.

12
San Marcos Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economic well being of the greater san marcos area

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Arts Movement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Sharp Healthcare Foundation — $10,070,000 · HealthSharp Healthcare Foundation+2 more — $38,600 · HealthGIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC — $112,500 · Youth DevelopmentJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $60,625 · Food & NutritionSan Diego Food System Alliance — $10,000 · Food & NutritionPACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT — $67,865 · Arts & CultureHEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION EFFRT — $35,000 · EducationNORTH SAN DIEGO BUSINESS CHAMBER — $35,000 · Community ImprovementASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION SAN DIEGO — $20,200 · OtherSAN DIEGO SECOND CHANCE PROGRAM — $5,300 · Employment
Health$10,108,600Youth Development$112,500Food & Nutrition$70,625Arts & Culture$67,865Education$35,000Community Improvement$35,000Other$20,200Employment$5,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSharp Healthcare Foundation — $10,070,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC — $112,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT — $67,865 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $60,625 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION EFFRT — $35,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetNORTH SAN DIEGO BUSINESS CHAMBER — $35,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetGrossmont Hospital Foundation — $27,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION SAN DIEGO — $20,200 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSan Diego Food System Alliance — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAN DIEGO SECOND CHANCE PROGRAM — $5,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Conrad Prebys FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sharp Health Plan funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sharp Health Plan?

    Find your warmest path to Sharp Health Plan through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph