Skip to content
Share Our Strength at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Share Our Strength

All children and families deserve to live free from hunger and poverty.

$15M
Granted FY2025still arriving
301
Grants FY2025still arriving
36
States reached
$740k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$188MEducation$15MHuman Services$8.1MCommunity Improvement$3.7MPublic Benefit$3.1MHealth$2.7MCivil Rights$2.1MYouth Development$2.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 301 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $228k
  • $10k–50k195 grants · $3.9M
  • $50k–250k65 grants · $5.8M
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.4M
$20,000
Median grant
36
States reached
$74M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Public Human Services Assoc$739,871
Maryland - Department of Human Services$600,000
District of Columbia - Department of Human Services$600,000
Central Susquehanna IU 16$596,917
Kentucky - Health and Family Services Cabinet$578,100
Wisconsin - Department of Public Instruction$300,000
School Based Health Alliance$275,000
Bonton Farms$257,500
San Francisco Human Services Agency$250,000
Meals4Families$250,000
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance$245,954
Feeding Kentucky$211,200
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy$205,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$172,150
Arizona Food Bank Network$165,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISLAND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $100k → 6%THE CURRENT PROJECT: $100k → 17%CELEBRATION NATION INC: $95k → 8%MIXTECOINDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $85k → 10%GROW BROOKLYN INC: $250k → 20%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $150k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $150k → 18%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $157k → 19%MOMS FIRST: $400k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 17%NATIVE AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $550k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $100k → 11%MISSOURI STATE ALLIANCE OF YMCAS: $77k → 10%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $80k → 18%MISSISSIPPI LOW-INCOME CHILD CARE INITIATIVE: $750k → 19%AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $903k → 7%MIDWEST FOOD BANK - FLORIDA DIVISION: $100k → 11%Mississippi Low-Income Child Care Initiative: $150k → 19%American Public Human Services Assoc: $740k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $157k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $97k → 9%MIDWEST FOOD BANK - FLORIDA DIVISION: $100k → 11%DAYTONA DREAM CENTER: $78k → 12%OUR VILLAGE OKEECHOBEE INC: $78k → 20%YMCA OF MEMPHIS & THE MID-SOUTH: $125k → 17%AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $669k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $95k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $100k → 16%HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $100k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $100k → 14%AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $449k → 7%MILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $84k → 17%AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $288k → 7%PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY FOOD POLICY COUNCIL: $157k → 11%CITYSQUARE: $176k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $92k → 23%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $95k → 13%RAISE TEXAS: $80k → 10%FAMILY LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE CITY: $165k → 19%FAMILY LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE CITY: $152k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $400k → 13%FAMILY LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE CITY: $100k → 19%NEW MOMS: $250k → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $200k → 14%MRELIEF: $573k → 14%MRELIEF: $415k → 14%mRelief: $132k → 14%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND: $150k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165M · 1067 repeat orgs$50M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

1067 repeat relationships: 201 still active in FY2025, 866 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1067
881

Total granted

$165M
$46M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+22%

Still filing today

43%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +18%
  • AH
    ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +99%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2.3M · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • WF
    WINDWARD FUND (URBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE)
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $750k · revenue +55%
  • NA
    NATIVE AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $550k · revenue +15% · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Arkansas Foodbank

None

Food & Nutrition
4
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
5
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food to cultivate community and alleviate hunger. through community food access, agriculture, education, and strategic partnerships, we work toward a…

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
8
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
10
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
11
Coastal Foodshed

A public health initiative working to make healthy local foods more available, more accessible, and more familiar by connecting local growers with local consumers as well as providing education around local food, nutrition, and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Brazos Valley Food Bank Inc

Cultivate an environment where our community can grow, contribute and thrive together. a more resilient brazos valley where nutritious food and opportunity are attainable for all.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Village Academies Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leroy Csd #1 Uw Ehw. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

886 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 886 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

45
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
176
Early backer (in before they grew)
864/886
Grantees still filing
627/886
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $2,325,363 · OtherUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $2,800,026 · Other+111 more: $50,400,491 · Other+111 moreARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $2,451,192 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS HUNGER RELIE…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,036,259 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD …ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $1,253,489 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOO…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $1,214,367 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTL…PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $1,166,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BREAD-THE WAL…ARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK: $1,114,851 · Food & NutritionHUNGER SOLUTIONS NEW YORK INC: $1,022,173 · Food & NutritionFEEDING KENTUCKY INC: $848,663 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $785,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $751,642 · Food & NutritionNourish California: $714,566 · Food & Nutrition+23 more: $7,608,123 · Food & Nutrition+23 moreAMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $3,048,357 · Human ServicesAMERICAN P…mRelief: $1,119,737 · Human ServicesmReliefMississippi Low-Income Childcare Initiative Inc: $900,000 · Human ServicesMississipp…FAMILY LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE CITY INC: $569,300 · Human ServicesFAMILY LEA…NATIVE AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $550,000 · Human ServicesURBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE INC: $410,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $400,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $363,200 · Human Services+11 more: $2,621,738 · Human Services+11 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $2,136,016 · EducationBAYLOR UN…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,959,600 · EducationJOHNS HOP…BENEFITS DATA TRUST: $1,750,000 · EducationBENEFITS …BONTON ENTERPRISES: $800,500 · EducationBONTON EN…The Education Trust Inc: $500,000 · EducationThe Educa…INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: $441,644 · EducationTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $388,093 · EducationSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $337,350 · EducationCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $333,968 · Education+3 more: $616,605 · Education+3 moreFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $2,287,193 · Community ImprovementFEEDING TEXAS: $1,331,000 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR THE MID SOUTH INC: $1,033,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC: $664,294 · Community ImprovementThe Middleburg Institute: $300,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $397,520 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $1,718,067 · HealthSchool-Based Health Alliance: $702,750 · HealthPresbyterian Healthcare Services: $374,826 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $365,268 · HealthWABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC: $361,000 · HealthACCESS HEALTHCOLUMBUS DBA HEALTH IMPACT OHIO: $350,000 · HealthCOLO ASSOCIATION FOR SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CARE: $350,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $210,000 · HealthEASTERN OREGON HEALTHY LIVING ALLIANCE: $200,000 · HealthCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC: $2,946,166 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY: $430,000 · Public BenefitThe Commonwealth Institute for: $260,000 · Public BenefitMAYOR'S INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN GOVERNMENT INC: $200,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN LOUISIANA: $200,000 · Public Benefit
Other$55,525,880Food & Nutrition$20,966,325Human Services$10,382,332Education$9,263,776Community Improvement$6,013,007Health$4,631,911Public Benefit$4,036,166

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $3,048,357 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC: $2,946,166 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $2,800,026 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $2,451,192 over 8y, 16% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $2,287,193 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $2,136,016 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,036,259 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,959,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBENEFITS DATA TRUST: $1,750,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $1,718,067 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $1,344,655 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS: $1,331,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $1,253,489 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $1,214,367 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $1,166,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetLIFT INC: $1,150,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetmRelief: $1,119,737 over 3y, 12% of budgetARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK: $1,114,851 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $1,100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE MID SOUTH INC: $1,033,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetHUNGER SOLUTIONS NEW YORK INC: $1,022,173 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetSCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION INC: $1,015,917 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $942,246 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetMississippi Low-Income Childcare Initiative Inc: $900,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetFEEDING KENTUCKY INC: $848,663 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetBONTON ENTERPRISES: $800,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $800,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $785,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetFLORIDA IMPACT INC: $782,036 over 5y, 54% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $751,642 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $750,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetNourish California: $714,566 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $712,500 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetSchool-Based Health Alliance: $702,750 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $688,519 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMaine Equal Justice Partners: $679,486 over 3y, 23% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC: $664,294 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $596,177 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetFAMILY LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE CITY INC: $569,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $535,629 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetREUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $500,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetFEEDING LOUISIANA: $455,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast: $453,885 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFOODCORPS INC: $443,463 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: $441,644 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY: $430,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BENEFITS DATA TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds mRelief ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE MID SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER SOLUTIONS NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Mississippi Low-Income Childcare Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds BONTON ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA IMPACT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GenYOUTH IncorporatedThe George W Bush Fou…Action for Healthy Ki…Round It Up America I…The Mr Holland's Opus…Project Lead the Way …Project Lead the Way …Food Research & Actio…Justin J Watt Foundat…North Carolina High S…Digital Promise GlobalSave the Music Founda…
GenYOUTH IncorporatedIL101.9× affinity391 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · The George W Bush Foundation · Action for Healthy Kids · Round It Up America Inc · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Food Research & Action Center · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc · North Carolina High School Athletic Association Inc · Digital Promise Global · Save the Music Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Share Our Strength funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Share Our Strength. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon: 31% of income from government
  • Asylee Women Enterprise Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc: 11% of income from government
  • America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
59report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Share Our Strength’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home