Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shane and Anna Meyer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$20kReligion$11kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$7kHealth$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Philanthropy$307Food & Nutrition$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$307
Median grant
6
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$2,500
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$1,524
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$523
UNITED WAY OF ATLANTA$307
THE ABILITY EXPERIENCE$250
Individual grant recipient$250
FARIBAULT EMERALDS DANCE TEAM$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MOM'S HOUSE: $50 → 18%Veterans Matter: $100 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OH
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Shane and Anna Meyer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 1%.

Shane and Anna Meyer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 6 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$31k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+75%

Still filing today

33%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentRecreation & SportsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS DE SALES SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $15k
  • SJ
    St Joseph
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k
  • ND
    NOTRE DAME ACADEMY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • HE
    HOPSON ELITE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Toledo Legal Aid Society

Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.

—
2
Toledo Early Learning Coalition Incorporated

To ensure that all youth ages 0-5 have access to quality early learning programs and services regardless of race sex economic status or geographical location and the ability and the support necessary to enter kindergarten ready to learn…

—
3
Leadership Toledo

Through a spectrum of programming for adults and high school students, lt offers individuals the opportunity to become more confident leaders, connect with the community, grow stronger in self-awareness, and serve in ways that are…

—
4
The Ability Center of Greater Toledo

To assist people with disabilities to live, work and socialize within a fully accessible community.

Human Services
5
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement
6
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
7
Lead Ohio

At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.

Education
8
League of Women Voters of Ohio

The league of women voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
9
United Way of Greater Toledo

United way of greater toledo unites the caring power of people to improve lives.

Philanthropy
10
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
11
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
12
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Service Center; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST FRANCIS DE SALES SCHOOL: $14,550 · OtherST FRANCIS DE SALES SCHOOLSt Joseph: $10,425 · OtherSt JosephIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPSON ELITE INC: $6,500 · OtherHOPSON ELITE INCNOTRE DAME ACADEMY: $2,574 · OtherSt Joseph School: $2,369 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+12 more: $3,622 · Other+12 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $523 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $307 · PhilanthropyTOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC: $250 · Food & Nutrition1MATTERSORG: $100 · Human ServicesMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $50 · Human ServicesOHIO TROOPERS COALITION: $105 · EmploymentTHE FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIE: $100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$49,040Health$3,023Philanthropy$307Food & Nutrition$250Human Services$150Employment$105Recreation & Sports$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ABILITY EXPERIENCE: $510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $307 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO TROOPERS COALITION: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE Learning Academy of Toledo: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZEPF CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY LAND CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1MATTERSORG: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ABILITY EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OHIO TROOPERS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE Learning Academy of Toledo ↗
  • Who funds ZEPF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds 1MATTERSORG ↗
  • Who funds MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shane and Anna Meyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shane and Anna Meyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shane and Anna Meyer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shane and Anna Meyer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shane and Anna Meyer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph