Loading…
· Public charity
SHALOM THRIFT SHOP INC
Raise funds for distribution to other non-profit organizations who assist those within the community in need of emergency food, shelter, clothing or other basic human needs.
$630k
Granted FY2024
27
Grants
1
Communities
$81k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of SHALOM THRIFT SHOP INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
educationunplannedreproductive healthallina healthmedicalfreespiritual
2019
—
2020
—
2021
allina healthmedicalhealth care
2022
housingchildrenhomelessnessrecoveryallina healthmedicalhealth care
2023
housinghomelessnesschildrenrecoveryallina healthmedicalhealth care
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 27 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $507k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
$18,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
- FIRST BAPTIST COMMUNITY CARE$81,000
- CAMBRIDGE FOOD PANTRY$44,000
- NEW PATHWAYS$41,000
- CAMBRIDGE SURPLUS FOOD DISTRI$36,500
- SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$36,000
- LIONS CHRISTMAS$25,000
- SALVATION ARMY$25,000
- NEW HOPE COMMUNITY CARE$23,000
- NORTH ISANTI BAPTIST CHURCH$19,400
- KARMEL COVENANT CHURCH$18,400
- NEW HOPE CHURCH$18,400
- FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$18,400
- JOY LUTHERAN CHURCH$18,400
- CROSS POINT CHURCH$18,400
- CAMBRIDGE LUTHERAN CHURCH$18,400
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 29 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
29
7
Total granted
$3.5M
$66k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+69%
+21%
Still filing today
34%
14%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHARBOR ROOM7× · 2017–2023 · $191k · revenue +39%
- SASENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $139k · revenue +40%
- PRPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- CPCROSS POINT CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $15k
- MSMULTIPLE SMALL GRANTS ASSISTANCEone grant, 2020 · $11k
- ECEAST CENTRAL ENERGYone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Hunger At Home
Hunger at home serves as a conduit between the business community and nonprofit partners by which excess food and other surplus is channeled to the homeless and the hungry.
Human Services
2
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
3
Pregnancy Care Center
To save lives & strengthen families by providing hope & help to women & men facing unplanned pregnancy via limited medical services, one-on-one coaching & education.
Health
4
Minnewaska Lutheran Home
Nursing home a community of services grounded in faith providing person centered care
—
5
Haven Health Clinics
To provide access to quality medical care, reproductive health services, and related education.
Health
6
Are You Hungry Npc
—
7
Maitri Compassionate Care
No one should have to suffer, transition, or die alone. maitri provides compassionate residential care to low-income people who are in need of hospice or 24-hour care for people living with hiv/aids or recovering from gender affirmation…
—
8
Centracare Clinic
We are here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.
Health
9
Evangelical Community Hospital
Provide health care services to the public and to be the community's health care provider of choice.
Health
10
Family Care Health Centers
During the year family care health centers provided services to approximately 16,734 patients. approximately 7,868 were under 100% of federal poverty.
Health
11
Home for Homeless Women
—
12
Eaton Rapids Medical Center
Care. serve. inspire. by providing healthcare services in eaton rapids, mi
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Isanti County Commission on Aging and the most unlike its peers is Allina Health System. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
11%
18/164
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$3,184,346Health$317,500Food & Nutrition$60,000Crime & Legal$43,700Human Services$18,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARBOR ROOM ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHERIDAN STORY ↗
- Who funds ISANTI CNTY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR FAMILY ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds MISSION 61 ↗
- Who funds LITTLE FARM CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds RIVER CITY RECOVERY MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL ENERGY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA2.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SHALOM THRIFT SHOP INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SALVATION ARMY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 411267116 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SALVATION ARMY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Shalom Thrift Shop Inc?
Find your warmest path to Shalom Thrift Shop Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines