Skip to content
Shaheen Family Charitable Foundation Fka Christ Caring for People Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Shaheen Family Charitable Foundation Fka Christ Caring for People Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$50kInternational$50kReligion$50kHuman Services$33kHousing & Shelter$20kPhilanthropy$15kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAGLE VALLEY CHILDRENS HOME$7,500
RENO PHILHARMONIC$5,000
ADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIND FOOD BANK: $5k → 11%OUR LADY OF THE SNOWS: $30k → 17%UNICEF USA: $25k → 17%FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $5k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 10%EAGLE VALLEY CHILDRENS HOME: $8k → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 10%ST THERESA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20k → 13%RENO PHILHARMONIC: $5k → 10%ST THERESA OF AVILA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN NEVADA: $5k → 13%UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $5k → 10%CAMP TLC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 3 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +415% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$46k
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+415%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NIGHT OFF THE STREETS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +415% · 68% of their budget
  • AT
    ADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +34%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE SNOWS
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada

To carry on charitable work in the field of religion, education, and social welfare within Northern Nevada.

Human Services
2
Healthy Nevada
Health
3
Nevada Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violen

NCEDSV provides advocacy, education and support of the front-line organizations that help those impacted by domestic and sexual assault and work towards the elimination of domestic and sexual violence against all persons.

Human Services
4
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Services of Nevada

CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and

Housing & Shelter
6
University of Nevada Alumni Association

The Nevada Alumni Association is here to foster and cultivate a common bond of pride, affinity and connection among alumni, students, prospective students and friends of the University of Nevada, Reno through quality programs, services and…

—
7
Northern Nevada International Center

Building bridges of understanding and fostering global engagement through international exchanges, refugee resettlement and language access.

—
8
Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County

A community where no one should feel the hurt of hunger. Interfaith Food Ministry feeds the hungry and works to reduce food insecurity in Nevada County. We help to sustain health, human dignity and the opportunity for individuals to…

Food & Nutrition
9
Carson Valley Community Food Closet Inc

The organizations mission is to alleviate food insecurity by providing supplemental food assistance to individuals and families in need. The organization receives monetary contributions used to purchase food and accepts donated food from…

Food & Nutrition
10
United Way of Southern Nevada

United way of southern nevada, inc. (the organization or united way) is a not-for-profit corporation governed by a local volunteer board of directors. the organization was incorporated in 1957 and its operations are primarily in clark…

Philanthropy
11
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Nevada Child Seekers

Nevada child seekers mission is to advocate for and engage in prevention, identification and location efforts on behalf of missing and exploited children.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northern Nevada and the Sierra; the most unlike its peers is Advocates to End Domestic Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSOUR LADY OF THE SNOWS: $30,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE SNOWSST THERESA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherST THERESA CATHOLIC CHURCHST THERESA OF AVILA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,050 · OtherST THERESA OF AVILA CATHOLIC SCHOOLEAGLE VALLEY CHILDRENS HOME: $7,500 · OtherEAGLE VALLEY CHILDRENS HOMESALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYBoys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR…United States Association for UNHCR: $25,000 · InternationalUnited States Associat…NIGHT OFF THE STREETS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesNIGHT OFF THE STR…ADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $18,500 · Human ServicesADVOCATES TO END …Community Foundation of Northern Nevada: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEVADA AND THE SIERRA: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$130,550International$50,000Human Services$38,500Philanthropy$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNIGHT OFF THE STREETS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $18,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEVADA AND THE SIERRA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renown HealthJohn Ben Snow Memoria…NV Energy Charitable …Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Renown HealthNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renown Health · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shaheen Family Charitable Foundation Fka Christ Caring for People Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shaheen Family Charitable Foundation Fka Christ Caring for People Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shaheen Family Charitable Foundation Fka Christ Caring for People’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home