Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shaffer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$403kCivil Rights$224kHuman Services$103kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$13kAnimals$11kCrime & Legal$10kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
XL MINISTRIES INC$15,000
ROCK HARBOR CHURCH$5,000
ATASCADERO BIBLE CHURCH$5,000
FOR THE CHILDREN$2,500
COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,500
MARE$2,000
WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY$1,500
CASA - SLO$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
CASA OF KERN COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOFFMAN HOSPICE: $3k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%HOFFMAN HOSPICE: $3k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HOFFMAN HOSPICE: $3k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%COVENANT COMMUNTY SERVICES: $10k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNTY SERVICES: $5k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNTY SERVICES: $5k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 18%HOFFMAN HOSPICE: $3k → 18%BAKERSFIELD ANGELS: $3k → 18%BAKERSFIELD ANGELS: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$655k · 17 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$655k
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+158%

Still filing today

59%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsRecreation & SportsInternationalAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $160k · revenue +48%
  • XM
    XL Ministries Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +82%
  • CC
    COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • LG
    LIVING GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • RI
    RADIUS INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +158%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
4
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
5
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
7
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
8
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
9
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
The Halo Trust (Usa) Inc

To protect lives and restore livelihoods of people affected by conflict: 1) to protect lives from the explosive threats and hazards resulting from conflict, 2) to reduce human suffering from armed violence and 3) to build resilient and…

International
12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For the Children; the most unlike its peers is American Freedom Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIVING GRACE CHURCH: $245,000 · OtherLIVING GRACE CHURCHXL Ministries Inc: $65,000 · OtherXL Ministries IncAMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCELIVING GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherLIVING GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCHMARE: $17,500 · OtherROYAL FAMILY KIDS CAMP: $17,500 · Other+14 more: $76,500 · Other+14 moreAMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE: $160,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIA…+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsCOVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesHoffmann Hospice of The Valley: $10,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesTRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOR THE CHILDREN: $27,500 · Recreation & SportsRADIUS INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 · HealthWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · Animals
Other$516,500Civil Rights$161,000Human Services$63,000Recreation & Sports$27,500International$15,000Health$12,000Animals$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE: $160,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetXL Ministries Inc: $65,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $42,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetFOR THE CHILDREN: $27,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRADIUS INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHoffmann Hospice of The Valley: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUST: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF KERN COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds XL Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds RADIUS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hoffmann Hospice of The Valley ↗
  • Who funds MUST ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds DESIRING GOD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF KERN COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kern Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · William & Florence Wheeler Foundation · The Cynthia Lake Charitable Trust · Greater Horizons · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shaffer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shaffer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shaffer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph