Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sfs Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$7.3MHealth$3.7MPhilanthropy$3.2MHuman Services$2.4MAnimals$2.0MArts & Culture$635kYouth Development$160kEnvironment$83kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+9 grants · $6.9M
$225,621
Median grant
4
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM$2,000,400
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$1,120,000
SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,016,296
SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION$835,000
SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$503,000
AVERA HEALTH FOUNDATION$440,000
SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$378,700
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION SOUTHWEST CHAPTER$330,000
SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$315,000
SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL COLLEGE$235,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION$225,621
SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT$200,000
MIDWEST HONOR FLIGHT$175,000
LIFESCAPE FOUNDATION$100,000
SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $1.1M → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $120k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $60k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $60k → 9%THE FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1.0M → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Sfs Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in SD; by stated purpose, 86%.

Sfs Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 13 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$12M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+149%

Still filing today

54%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +52%
  • MH
    MIDWEST HONOR FLIGHT - IA & SD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $535k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • FM
    FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue -59% · 34% of their budget
  • MJ
    MARY JO WEGNER ARBORETUM
    one grant, 2022 · $83k
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA PARKINSON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +149%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Dakota State University Foundation

Enhancing excellence by cultivating generosity and treasuring the loyalty of all we serve.

Education
2
South Dakota Community Foundation

Receive and administer charitable gifts and permanent endowments primarily for the benefit of south dakotans. work with donors, charities, and community leaders to strengthen philanthropy in south dakota.

Philanthropy
3
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
4
Downtown Sioux Falls

Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.

—
5
Sioux Falls Environmental Access Inc
—
6
Sd Association of Healthcare Organizations

Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.

—
7
South Dakota Voices for Peace

Sd voices for peace provides five programming areas to assist vulnerable communities access services throughout the state: legal services, multilingual outreach, training and education, advocacy and civic engagement and rapid response.

—
8
University of Sioux Falls

The university of sioux falls, a christian university in the liberal arts tradition, educates students in the humanities, sciences and professions. the traditional motto of the university is culture for service, that is, we seek to foster…

Education
9
South Dakota Retailers Association

Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.

—
10
South Dakota State University Alumni Association

Foster loyalty and fellowship among South Dakota State University Alumni, Faculty, Students and Former Students.

Education
11
South Dakota Golf Association Junior Golf Foundation

Carry out charitable & educational purposes of sdga

Youth Development
12
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Toy Lending Library of Sd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT #49-5: $5,000,000 · OtherSIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT #49-5PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION SOUTHWEST CHAPTER: $1,035,000 · OtherPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION SOUTHWEST CHAPTERAVERA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $765,000 · OtherAVERA HEALTH FOUNDATIONSOUTHEAST TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $490,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST TECHNICAL COLLEGESIOUX FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $349,000 · Other+6 more: $599,400 · Other+6 moreSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,175,796 · PhilanthropySIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY …SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,515,000 · PhilanthropySANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,360,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HO…FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesFURNITURE MIS…SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM: $2,000,400 · AnimalsSIOUX FALLS…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $480,604 · EducationSIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $378,700 · EducationToy Lending Library of SD: $229,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $140,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS: $100,000 · EducationMIDWEST HONOR FLIGHT - IA & SD: $535,000 · Arts & CultureMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH: $150,000 · HealthLIFESCAPE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthSOUTH DAKOTA PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $18,000 · Health
Other$8,238,400Philanthropy$4,690,796Human Services$2,360,000Animals$2,000,400Education$1,328,304Arts & Culture$535,000Health$268,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,175,796 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetSIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM: $2,000,400 over 1y, 12% of budgetSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,515,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,360,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,000,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetMIDWEST HONOR FLIGHT - IA & SD: $535,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $480,604 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetToy Lending Library of SD: $229,000 over 3y, 79% of budgetMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH: $150,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESCAPE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST HONOR FLIGHT - IA & SD ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Toy Lending Library of SD ↗
  • Who funds MCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFESCAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RANCH ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA PARKINSON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation IncSD30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · South Dakota Community Foundation · Avera Health · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Graco Foundation · The James and Eloise Elmen Foundation · Sioux Steel Company Foundation · Levo Cares Foundation · Sioux Empire United Way Inc · Sheldon F Reese Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sfs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sfs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sfs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph