· Public charity
SF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte
Sponsoring and organizing events and activities focused on and around the last Sunday in June of each year, in commemoration of the action and spirit of the Stonewall Resistance of 1969--the symbolic renewal of the Lesbian/Gay Rights movement to coordinate, facilitate and serve the community by providing the mechanism for the…
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of SF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $45,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $50,742 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,742 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLBT Historical Society | $25,000 |
| Transgender Cultural District | $10,000 |
| LGBT Asylum Project | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFolsom Street3× · 2017–2019 · $48k · revenue -49%
- BABay Area Youth Rugby Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $48k
- PAPerforming Arts Social Society Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue -49%
Funded once
Berkeley Community Health Project DBA Berkeley Free Clinicone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -5%- PAPagan Allianceone grant, 2019 · $7k
- GPGAY PRIDE CELEBRATION COMMITTEE OF SAN JOSEone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of ggba is to champion opportunity, development, and advocacy for lgbt & allied business community.
The Bay Area Rainbow Symphony (BARS) is an orchestra that provides a safe and inclusive environment to musicians of all sexual orientations, genderidentites and gender expressions. BARS makes cultural, social and educational contributions…
The BAYMEC Community Foundation is dedicated to the creation of a more equal future for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) community in Silicon Valley and neighboring regionsThrough a balanced approach…
Stonewall Sports - Twin Cities is a LGBTQ+ community-based sports league that values each player for who they are and what they bring to our community. We strive to develop a well-connected and diverse community through organized…
Welcoming LGBTQIA+ soccer players to the game
Monterey Peninsula Pride creates celebratory and safe spaces for LGBTQIA+ expression and allyship across the Monterey Peninsula.
Celebrating all sexual orientations and gender identities, The Queer Chorus of San Francisco provides an open and artistic environment for singers committed to musical excellence. Our performances entertain, educate, and inspire audiences…
Amateur Sports - We are a club that develops skill and knowledge of rugby football while furthering diversity in the sport. In pursuit of this mission, Washington Scandals RFC shall conduct clinics, workshops, lessons, and seminars at…
Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people
Sponsoring and organizing events and activities focused on and around the last Sunday in June of each year, in commemoration of the action and spirit of the Stonewall Resistance of 1969--the symbolic renewal of the Lesbian/Gay Rights…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Folsom Street and the most unlike its peers is St James Infirmary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Folsom Street ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Youth Rugby Inc ↗
- Who funds Performing Arts Social Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Gay Softball League Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALING WATERS WILDERNESS ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SPIKES ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Community Church San Francisco ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Pride Band Inc FKA San Francisco Lesbian/Gay Freedom Ba ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES INFIRMARY ↗
- Who funds Center for Immigrant Protection ↗
- Who funds Berkeley Community Health Project DBA Berkeley Free Clinic ↗
- Who funds GAY PRIDE CELEBRATION COMMITTEE OF SAN JOSE ↗
- Who funds TURNOUT INC ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA DERBY GIRLS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Horizons Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Grass Roots Gay Rights Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization SF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to SF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte?
Find your warmest path to SF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.