Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Seymour and Sylvia Rothchild Family 2004 Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$224k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Environment$337kInternational$264kCivil Rights$169kHuman Services$137kEducation$124kRecreation & Sports$90kPhilanthropy$85kFood & Nutrition$65kArts & Culture$62kOther$369k
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $122k
$4,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE$35,000
SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND$12,500
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC$12,500
MIDDLEBRIDGE SCHOOL INC$12,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$10,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
WELCOME PROJECT INC$10,000
WEST END HOUSE INC$10,000
NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC$10,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC$6,500
SPOONFULS INC$5,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$5,500
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC$5,000
GAZA MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$5,000
FOOD PROJECT INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%SACRAMENTO LOAVES AND FISHES: $3k → 12%SACRAMENTO LOAVES AND FISHES: $3k → 12%SACRAMENTO LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 12%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $3k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $3k → 8%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $3k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $3k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5k → 16%YOUTHCARE: $1k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $1k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $1k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $1k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Seymour and Sylvia Rothchild Family 2004 Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Seymour and Sylvia Rothchild Family 2004 Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 57 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+8%

Still filing today

95%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MIDDLEBRIDGE SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +25%
  • WE
    WEST END HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +59%
  • TW
    THE WELCOME PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +154%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PEOPLE'S FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -83%
  • TA
    THE AFTERMATH PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -49%
  • MS
    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT
    one grant, 2022 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
5
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
10
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
11
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Gaza Mental Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Health Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development CentersJewish Community Organizati…Immigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/79
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,486

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/79
Grantees still filing
53/79
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $167,500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIAN…NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $88,000 · EnvironmentNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFE…HONOR THE EARTH — $16,250 · EnvironmentSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $12,500 · Environment+4 more — $27,500 · Environment+4 moreGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $55,500 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERN…THE GAZA MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · InternationalTHE GAZA MENTAL H…FRIENDS OF AL-ROWWAD USA INC — $27,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF AL-ROW…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $22,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH W…NEW ISRAEL FUND — $22,500 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $19,500 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONC…AMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF) — $16,000 · InternationalAMREF HEALTH AFRI…A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE — $15,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FO…INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $10,000 · InternationalWashington Physicians for Social Responsibility — $9,500 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $9,000 · International+3 more — $7,000 · InternationalTHE WELCOME PROJECT INC — $90,000 · OtherTHE WELCOME PROJECT INCREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL S — $43,000 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATI…SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $25,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $31,250 · OtherCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONThe Food Project Inc — $45,000 · OtherThe Food Project IncSPOONFULS — $19,500 · OtherDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC — $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $37,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERI…ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC — $20,000 · OtherCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $26,000 · Other+29 more — $167,750 · Other+29 moreAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $56,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CI…CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $38,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR …Southern Center for Human Rights — $36,000 · Civil RightsSouthern Ce…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $22,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IM…Physicians For Reproductive Health — $8,000 · Civil Rights+3 more — $7,500 · Civil RightsPonheary Ly Foundation — $50,250 · Human ServicesPonheary …THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME …Seattle Housing and Resource Effort — $8,000 · Human ServicesSeattle H…THE PEOPLE'S FUND — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPL…SACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHES — $6,500 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE — $5,000 · Human Services+4 more — $9,500 · Human Services+4 moreMIDDLEBRIDGE SCHOOL INC — $108,500 · EducationMITCHELL COLLEGE — $15,000 · EducationWEST END HOUSE INC — $90,000 · Recreation & Sports
Environment$336,750International$263,500Other$579,500Civil Rights$169,000Human Services$136,750Education$123,500Recreation & Sports$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $167,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMIDDLEBRIDGE SCHOOL INC — $108,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWEST END HOUSE INC — $90,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WELCOME PROJECT INC — $90,000 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $88,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $56,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $55,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPonheary Ly Foundation — $50,250 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GAZA MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Project Inc — $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $38,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights — $36,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $31,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC — $30,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF AL-ROWWAD USA INC — $27,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $26,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $25,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPOONFULS — $19,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSICWORKS — $17,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $16,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH — $16,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF) — $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE — $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL COLLEGE — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Alliance for Global Justice — $14,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM — $11,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPUGET SOUND SAGE — $10,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Physicians for Social Responsibility — $9,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGot Green — $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health — $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSeattle Housing and Resource Effort — $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE'S FUND — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSacramento Region Community Foundation — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CODEX FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBRIDGE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST END HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WELCOME PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Ponheary Ly Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE GAZA MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AL-ROWWAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSICWORKS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds AMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF) ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Community Alliance for Global Justice ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds PUGET SOUND SAGE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincThe Satterberg Founda…Boston Foundation IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Combined Jewish Phila…Social Justice Fund N…Seattle FoundationGive Lively Foundatio…The Robert Wood Johns…The Bullitt FoundationProteus Fund IncThe Ford Foundation
ImpactassetsincMD23.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Social Justice Fund Northwest · Seattle Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seymour and Sylvia Rothchild Family 2004 Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc — 24% of income from government
  • New England Innocence Project — 12% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Survival Centers Inc — 9% of income from government
  • The Welcome Project Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Mitchell College — 2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • West End House Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seymour and Sylvia Rothchild Family 2004 Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Seymour and Sylvia Rothchild Family 2004 Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines