Skip to content
Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred) at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)

Sacred provides immediate financial support to families in need due to child sexual abuse.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$518kHuman Services$103kHealth$86k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $215,859, the rows itemized in this filing. The $244,793 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,934 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $161k
$11,296
Median grant
9
States reached
$276k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KID'S HARBOR INC$20,343
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF DOUGLAS COUNTY$19,363
CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC$19,239
OZARK FOOTHILLS CHILD ADOVCACY CENTER$15,233
CENTER FOR HOPE$15,084
CAC OF THE BLUE GRASS KY$14,093
CAC OF COLLIER COUNTY FL$12,306
Individual grant recipient$12,229
MARION COUNTY CAC OCALA FL$11,657
LIFEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCAY CENTER INC$11,296
THE TREEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MD$10,004
CAC OF PITTSBURG KS$8,202
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY$8,007
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$7,965
HOPE UNLIMITED$7,960
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VERITY REDWOOD CHILDREN'S CENTER: $13k → 7%SUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $9k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON AND CHEROKEE CO: $15k → 17%CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER COUNTY: $9k → 10%HOPE UNLIMITED: $9k → 16%KID'S HARBOR INC: $20k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $1k → 9%A CHILD'S VOICE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $7k → 11%VERITY REDWOOD CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 7%CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON AND CHEROKEE CO: $11k → 17%HOPE UNLIMITED: $8k → 16%KID'S HARBOR INC: $11k → 13%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 17%KID'S HARBOR INC: $8k → 13%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $9k → 17%HOPE CENTER INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CT
CA
MO
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 20 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$687k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $151k · revenue +76%
  • LH
    LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $81k · revenue +21%
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO
    4× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • KB
    KVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE MISSOURI INC
    one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue +23%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $17k · revenue 0%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services
2
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
3
Childrens Advocacy Center of Smith County

The children's advocacy center of smith county's mission is to protect and restore the lives of abused children through team investigations, healing services, community outreach and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
4
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
5
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
6
Children's Advocacy Center of Comal Coun

To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
8
Safe Spot Child Advocacy Center of Wilkes

To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…

Youth Development
9
Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal
10
Childrens Advocacy Center for Child Abuse Assessment and Treatment

We provide children affected by violence and their families with services of support, forensic interviews, resources, and hope.

Crime & Legal
11
Morgan County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a safe caring place to evaluate any child who may have been abused

Crime & Legal
12
Children's Advocacy Center of Ottawa Countyinc

Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Advocacy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sutter County Community Action Agency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
30/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC: $150,514 · Crime & LegalCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INCSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $48,426 · Crime & LegalSUNFLOWER HOUSE INCTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC: $31,757 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MI…THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $22,125 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INCTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $20,043 · Crime & LegalTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOC…CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY: $16,096 · Crime & LegalChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District: $12,582 · Crime & Legal+7 more: $35,322 · Crime & Legal+7 moreChildren's Advocacy Center of Douglas County Inc: $37,917 · OtherChildren's Advocacy Center …KVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE MISSOURI INC: $26,575 · OtherKVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE M…COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF CECIL COUNTY INC: $16,527 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATI…OZARK FOOTHILLS CHILD ADOVCACY CENTER: $15,233 · OtherOZARK FOOTHILLS CHILD ADOVC…CAC OF THE BLUE GRASS KY: $14,093 · OtherCAC OF THE BLUE GRASS KYCHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC: $13,835 · OtherCHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTIN…SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $13,521 · OtherSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICE…CAC OF COLLIER COUNTY FL: $12,306 · OtherCAC OF COLLIER COUNTY FLIndividual grant recipient: $12,229 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARION COUNTY CAC OCALA FL: $11,657 · OtherWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $8,396 · OtherCAC OF PITTSBURG KS: $8,202 · OtherSOS Inc: $8,170 · Other+5 more: $25,086 · Other+5 moreCRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO: $44,797 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER OF A…KIDS HARBOR INC: $39,083 · Human ServicesKIDS HARBOR INCREDWOOD CITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMINC: $21,724 · Human ServicesREDWOOD CITY CHILD…HOPE UNLIMITED INC: $16,645 · Human ServicesHOPE UNLIMITED INCCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO: $9,271 · Human ServicesCHILD ADVOCACY CEN…SUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $8,551 · Human ServicesSUTTER COUNTY COMM…A Childs Voice Child Advocacy Center In: $7,414 · Human Services+2 more: $2,471 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $80,709 · HealthLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH…The Tree House Child Advocacy Center of Montgomery County MD Inc: $24,232 · HealthThe Tree House Ch…ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $17,268 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN…THE STEPPING STONE CHILD ADVOCACY: $15,211 · HealthTHE STEPPING STON…+2 more: $4,103 · HealthCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC: $37,648 · Youth DevelopmentLIFEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERINC: $29,120 · Recreation & SportsSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $3,244 · Civil Rights
Crime & Legal$336,865Other$223,747Human Services$149,956Health$141,523Youth Development$37,648Recreation & Sports$29,120Civil Rights$3,244

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC: $150,514 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $80,709 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $48,426 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO: $44,797 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKIDS HARBOR INC: $39,083 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetChildren's Advocacy Center of Douglas County Inc: $37,917 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC: $37,648 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC: $31,757 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLIFEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERINC: $29,120 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetKVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE MISSOURI INC: $26,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Tree House Child Advocacy Center of Montgomery County MD Inc: $24,232 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $22,125 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetREDWOOD CITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMINC: $21,724 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $20,043 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $17,268 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE UNLIMITED INC: $16,645 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY: $16,096 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STEPPING STONE CHILD ADVOCACY: $15,211 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC: $13,835 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $13,521 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District: $12,582 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO: $9,271 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $8,551 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $8,396 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOS Inc: $8,170 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMarion County Children's Avocacy Center Inc: $7,653 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetA Childs Voice Child Advocacy Center In: $7,414 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARYLAND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $6,687 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY CH: $6,421 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTONE COUNTY ASSISTANCE TEAM: $6,408 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the Finger Lakes: $5,024 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $3,244 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSaint Lukes Health System Inc: $2,772 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $2,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $1,568 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD SAFE OF CENTRAL MISSOURI INC: $1,561 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPats Place Child Advocacy Center: $1,331 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $1,021 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Children's A…Missouri Network Agai…Missouri Children's T…The Sunderland Founda…Commerce Bancshares F…The Morgan Family Fou…Oppenstein Brothers F…Jackson County Commun…Health Forward Founda…United Way of Greater…Greater Kansas City C…Bnsf Railway Foundati…
National Children's Alliance IncDC46× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Children's Alliance Inc · Missouri Network Against Child Abuse · Missouri Children's Trust Fund · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Morgan Family Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Maryland Children's Alliance Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)?

Find your warmest path to Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home