Skip to content

· Public charity

Seventh Generation Advisors

SEVENTH GENERATION ADVISORS focuses on ways to preserve the environment by advocating policy and promoting a sustainable economy.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$256k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$3.4MAnimals$2.2MReligion$975kCivil Rights$139kPhilanthropy$54kEducation$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $1,023,720, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,311,824 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $288,104 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
$250,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISHTOYO FOUNDATION$256,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI$250,000
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN$250,000
CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY$250,000
CHARTER SCHOOLS GARDENA$17,720
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WISHTOYO FOUNDATION: $300k → 10%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $250k → 10%LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER: $21k → 10%CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER ALLIAN: $50k → 12%R20: $15k → 14%SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $250k → 14%LEADERSHIP COUNCIL FOR JUSTIC: $40k → 19%HAWAII ALLIANCE FOR PROG ACT: $99k → 9%CENTER FOR ORAGUTANS & CHIMPS: $60k → 10%FUSEE: $35k → 15%CHIMP SANCTUARY NW: $169k → 11%CHIMP HAVEN: $38k → 22%WISHTOYO FOUNDATION: $256k → 10%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $200k → 10%CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $250k → 12%CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUND: $54k → 14%SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $200k → 14%FUSEE: $6k → 15%CHIMP SANCTUARY NW: $78k → 11%WISHTOYO FOUNDATION: $225k → 10%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $200k → 10%CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $200k → 12%NRDC: $24k → 14%SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $200k → 14%WISHTOYO FOUNDATION: $205k → 10%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $159k → 10%CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $200k → 12%WILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $968k → 14%SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $125k → 14%WISHTOYO FOUNDATION: $125k → 10%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $125k → 10%CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $125k → 12%WILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $20k → 14%SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $125k → 14%WISHTOYO FOUNDATION: $123k → 10%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $125k → 10%CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $125k → 12%ENERGY INDEPENDENCE NOW: $17k → 14%SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $75k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $18k → 10%CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $91k → 12%CHARTER SCHOOLS GARDENA: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
CA
HI
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 7 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$5.5M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-44%
+86%

Still filing today

43%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WISHTOYO FOUNDATION DBA WISHTOYO CHUMASH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue -44% · 29% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M
  • CN
    CALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $991k

Funded once

  • ST
    SAVE THE CHIMPS
    one grant, 2023 · $771k
  • HA
    HAWAII ALLIANCE FOR PROG ACT
    one grant, 2024 · $99k
  • ST
    SAVE THE CHIMPS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
2
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
3
Conservation Earth Inc

Wildmind pioneered educational programs where animals are the teachers as a powerful and effective way to help students and adults reconnect to the living world. wildmind helps teachers meet the essential california state science content…

Animals
4
Asia Wild

Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…

Animals
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
7
CalWild

The California Wilderness Coalition protects the natural landscapes that make California unique, providing clean air and water, a home to wildlife, and a place for recreation and spiritual renewal.

—
8
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
9
City Wildlife Inc

The goals of City Wildlife are to rescue sick, orphaned, and injured wild animals and return them to the wild; to promote the enjoyment of and harmonious co-existence with native wildlife; and to protect the District of Columbias wild…

Education
10
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
11
Chintimini Wildlife Center

Chintimini wildlife center provides care for injured and orphaned wildlife with the goal of returning them to their natural habitat, and fosters a connection between people and wildlife through education.

Animals
12
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Chimps Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Waystation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSI: $1,058,500 · OtherCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSICALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $991,261 · OtherCALIF NATIVE PLANT SOCIETYSANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH IN: $975,000 · OtherSANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INSAVE THE CHIMPS: $771,386 · OtherSAVE THE CHIMPS+8 more: $317,519 · Other+8 moreWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $988,025 · AnimalsWILDLIFE WAYSTATIONCHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST: $246,940 · AnimalsCHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY N…SAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $64,707 · Animals+2 more: $60,372 · AnimalsWISHTOYO FOUNDATION DBA WISHTOYO CHUMASH FOUNDATION: $1,234,150 · Arts & CultureWISHTOYO FOUNDATION …CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $53,700 · PhilanthropyCalifornia Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance: $50,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $18,390 · EducationENERGY INDEPENDENCE NOW COALITION: $17,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,113,666Animals$1,360,044Arts & Culture$1,234,150Philanthropy$53,700Environment$50,000Education$18,390Public Benefit$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISHTOYO FOUNDATION DBA WISHTOYO CHUMASH FOUNDATION: $1,234,150 over 6y, 29% of budgetWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $988,025 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST: $246,940 over 2y, 13% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $64,707 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $53,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance: $50,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $37,972 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREWILD: $22,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $18,390 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENERGY INDEPENDENCE NOW COALITION: $17,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISHTOYO FOUNDATION DBA WISHTOYO CHUMASH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE WAYSTATION ↗
  • Who funds CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds REWILD ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY INDEPENDENCE NOW COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seventh Generation Advisors funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seventh Generation Advisors. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seventh Generation Advisors?

    Find your warmest path to Seventh Generation Advisors through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seventh Generation Advisors’ filings →

    More from the funding graph