Skip to content
Seven Tepees Youth Program at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Seven Tepees Youth Program

None

$2.4M
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2026.

Youth Development$900kHealth$782kPhilanthropy$738kEnvironment$250kHuman Services$125kEducation$28k
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $27,776, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,409,005 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,381,229 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$27,776
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$27,776
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENTIS: $100k → 9%CENTRAL AMERICAN REFUGEE CENTER OF NORTHERN CA: $125k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
2
Institute for Public Strategies

Institute of Public Strategies (IPS) is a nonprofit corporation that receives its funding from local and federal governmental agencies and private foundations, through long-term grants or contracts to provide community-level services…

Health
3
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
4
Westside Community Mental Health Center Westside Community Services Inc

The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.

Health
5
The California Center for Civic Participation

To educate california youth about the operations of local, state, and federal government.

Public Benefit
6
Latino Commission On Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services

The Latino Commission provides a multitude of services throughout the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Tulare. The Organization currently employs twelve programs eight for adults, and four for youth and transitional age youth…

Health
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
9
Community Youth Center of San Francisco

Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…

—
10
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
11
Cal-Pep Inc

Calpep is dedicated to providing coordinated hiv, substance abuse, mental health, employment support, and violence prevention services to the highest need communities of color in the san francisco bay area.

—
12
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central American Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Baja Coastal Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUSTICE OUTSIDE: $437,500 · PhilanthropyJUSTICE OUTSIDETIDES FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONKAZAN MCCLAIN PARTNERS' FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyKAZAN MCCLAIN PARTNERS' FOUND…RYSE INC: $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentRYSE INC3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC: $200,000 · Youth Development3RD STREET YOUTH CENTE…INSTITUTO FAMILIAR DE LA RAZA: $250,000 · OtherINSTITUTO FAMILIAR DE…HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $250,000 · OtherHORIZONS UNLIMITED OF…AIDVANTAGEUS DEPT EDUCATION: $27,776 · OtherMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES: $256,600 · HealthMISSION AR…BAJA COASTAL INSTITUTE INC: $250,000 · EnvironmentBAJA COAST…CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $125,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL A…MENTIS: $100,000 · Human ServicesMENTISDestiny Arts Center: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsAfrican American Wellness Project: $100,000 · Education
Philanthropy$737,500Youth Development$550,000Other$527,776Health$256,600Environment$250,000Human Services$225,000Recreation & Sports$175,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRYSE INC: $350,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetINSTITUTO FAMILIAR DE LA RAZA: $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHORIZONS UNLIMITED OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $250,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMENTIS: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAfrican American Wellness Project: $100,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetDestiny Arts Center: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKAZAN MCCLAIN PARTNERS' FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Kaiser Foundation Hos…McNabb FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…Crankstart FoundationCalifornia Healthcare…The California Wellne…The William & Flora H…Silicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincThe Zellerbach Family…Stupski Foundation
The San Francisco FoundationCA24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · Stupski Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seven Tepees Youth Program funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seven Tepees Youth Program. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seven Tepees Youth Program’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home