Skip to content

· Private foundation

Setty Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$331kReligion$110kInternational$81kArts & Culture$75kHuman Services$28kHealth$27kEducation$14kEmployment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SRI SEVI VISHNU TEMPLE$35,101
NORTH AMERICAN VISHWA KANNADA ASSOC$10,000
CHINMAYA MISSION WRC$7,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$6,000
GEORGETOWNLOMBARDI$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA$3,000
HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,000
DC CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $5k → 12%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 15%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $10k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $5k → 12%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $6k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $5k → 12%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $4k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $4k → 12%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $3k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $3k → 12%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $3k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $3k → 12%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $2k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $3k → 12%HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $1k → 8%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $2k → 12%ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OR
PA
NJ
UT
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Setty Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Setty Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$576k · 14 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$576k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+18%

Still filing today

43%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KK
    KAVERI KANNADA ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $33k · revenue +9%
  • AI
    ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +99%
  • KD
    KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
    2× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • TK
    THE KAILASH GOYAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +18%
  • B
    BASISED
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kaival Gyan Chicago Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Desai Foundation
Education
5
Rukhsana Tahirkheli Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Ek Kadam Aur

Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.

International
7
Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Kkc Foundation
—
9
Gupta Family Foundation
Philanthropy
10
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
11
Kalpana Datta Cencer Care Foundation

Raise cancer risk awareness

Health
12
Kallir Research Institute
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dc Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kailash Goyal Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASHRAE FOUNDATION: $330,999 · OtherASHRAE FOUNDATIONSRI SEVI VISHNU TEMPLE: $68,189 · OtherSRI SEVI VISHNU TEMPLEKAVERI KANNADA ASSOCIATION INC: $32,500 · OtherKAVERI KANNADA ASSOCIATION INCCHINMAYA MISSION WRC: $28,503 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION WRC+18 more: $70,603 · Other+18 moreALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $32,102 · Human ServicesALL INDIA …HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $28,102 · Human ServicesHINDU AMER…+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $47,522 · InternationalASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureKIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $4,500 · EducationCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationTHE KAILASH GOYAL FOUNDATION: $5,001 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,501 · HealthCIT INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $200 · Health
Other$530,794Human Services$60,304International$47,522Arts & Culture$20,000Education$5,500Philanthropy$5,001Health$2,701

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $47,522 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKAVERI KANNADA ASSOCIATION INC: $32,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $32,102 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $28,102 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE KAILASH GOYAL FOUNDATION: $5,001 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetKIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,501 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIT INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds KAVERI KANNADA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KAILASH GOYAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CIT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Setty Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Setty Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Setty Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph