· Private foundation
Serviam Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $147k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $264k
- $250k+1 grant · $623k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $623,100 |
| UCLA - CONGO BASIN INSTITUTE ENDOWMENT | $100,000 |
| SETON HALL UNIVERSITY | $57,000 |
| OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN | $54,400 |
| BERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $52,500 |
| BERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $27,150 |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $26,000 |
| EVA'S VILLAGE | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| SALESIAN SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN BOSCO | $24,013 |
| ST ELIZABETH'S CHURCH | $20,000 |
| COVENANT COMMUNITY CHURCH | $9,000 |
| ST JOSEPH BY THE SEA | $5,000 |
| ANDRE SAYEGH CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC | $5,000 |
| EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE OF JERUSALEM | $4,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HNHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC7× · 2019–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +133%
- BPBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC8× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +22%
EVA'S VILLAGE INC6× · 2018–2025 · $293k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- AOArray of Hope Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +38%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $25k
- MHMARY HELP OF CHRISTIANS ACADEMY INCone grant, 2023 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery network & to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
To provide comprehensive, state-of-the-art patient services; emphasize caring and other human values in the treatment of patients and in relations with their families, and among employees, medical staff, and community; be a center of…
Hackensack volunteer ambulance corps., inc., dispatched as squad 1060, is licensed as a bls provider by the nj dept of health, office of emergency medical servies (oem). the corps provides emergency medical servies to the city of…
Rwjbarnabas health - as the leading academic health system in new jersey - is advancing innovative strategies in high quality patient care, education and research to address both the clinical and social determinants of health. the entities…
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
The corporation will further the charitable and healthcare purposes of hackensack meridian health, inc. and its internal revenue code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Daughters of Miriam Center and the most unlike its peers is Allendale Foundation for Educational Excellenceinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Array of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANDRE SAYEGH CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLENDALE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCEINC ↗
- Who funds HIDDEN WATER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The O'Shea Family Foundation · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Td Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Serviam Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Daughters of Miriam Center — 1% of income from government
- Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Serviam Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Serviam Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.