Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sending Support Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$45k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Sending Support Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 15 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
’17
22
’18
20
’19
16
’20
17
’21
15
’22
14
’23
15
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$331kPhilanthropy$226kEducation$164kHuman Services$138kReligion$126kArts & Culture$72kRecreation & Sports$64kCivil Rights$51kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $85k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish National Fund$45,000
Rose Community Foundation$40,000
Beloit College$6,000
ADL Mountain States Region$6,000
Jewish Family Service$6,000
Mutual Ground$5,000
Aurora Area Interfaith Food Pantry$5,000
Small donations 501 detail on file$4,500
Partners in Torah$4,000
She'arim College of Jewish Studies$4,000
The Hebrew Educational Alliance$3,300
MIT-Sloan School of Management$3,000
The Penn Fund Univ of Pennsylania$3,000
RM Planned Parenthood$3,000
CASA Kane County$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Mutual Ground: $9k → 8%Mutual Ground: $9k → 8%Mutual Ground: $9k → 8%Mutual Ground: $9k → 8%Mutual Ground: $9k → 8%Mutual Ground: $8k → 8%Mutual Ground: $7k → 8%Mutual Ground: $5k → 8%Jewish Family Service: $8k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $8k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $8k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $6k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $5k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $5k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $5k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CO
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Sending Support Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Sending Support Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$674k · 40 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
5

Total granted

$674k
$18k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MUTUAL GROUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +105%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +107%
  • AA
    AURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • PS
    Paramount School of the Arts
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • UW
    United Way Foundation Denver
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CF
    Charcot-Marie-Tooth Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
9
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
10
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pencils of Promise Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Jewish International Connection Ny Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $325,330 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN K…+2 more: $10,000 · InternationalShwayder Camp-Goldman Fund: $47,530 · OtherShwayder Camp-Goldman FundShe'arim College of Jewish Studies: $38,000 · OtherShe'arim College of Jewish StudiesCONGREGATION HEBREW EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE: $25,950 · OtherCONGREGATION HEBREW EDUCATIONAL ALLI…ADL Mountain States Region: $24,000 · OtherADL Mountain States RegionSmall donations 501 detail on file: $23,650 · OtherSmall donations 501 detail on fileThe Penn Fund Univ of Pennsylania: $21,000 · OtherDaily Pennsylvanian-Eric Jacobson F: $19,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $24,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUECASA KANE COUNTY: $18,500 · OtherAURORA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $18,500 · OtherJEWISH INTERNATIONAL CONNECTION NY INC: $17,600 · Other+28 more: $145,350 · Other+28 moreRose Community Foundation: $223,000 · PhilanthropyRose Community Found…JEWISHColorado: $14,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColoradoMUTUAL GROUND INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesMUTUAL GR…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FA…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $30,000 · EducationBELOIT COLLEGE: $27,500 · EducationBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationAURORA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationFood For Thought Denver: $5,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College: $4,500 · EducationPARTNERS IN TORAH: $59,500 · ReligionAURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $43,700 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
International$335,330Other$423,080Philanthropy$237,000Human Services$113,000Education$88,000Religion$59,500Food & Nutrition$45,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $325,330 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRose Community Foundation: $223,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMUTUAL GROUND INC: $65,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN TORAH: $59,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $48,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $43,700 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $27,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $18,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $18,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH INTERNATIONAL CONNECTION NY INC: $17,600 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSportswomen of Colorado Inc: $11,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MUTUAL GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN TORAH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH INTERNATIONAL CONNECTION NY INC ↗
  • Who funds BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds Sportswomen of Colorado Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AURORA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds PENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Twelve Twenty-One FundCO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Twelve Twenty-One Fund · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · McGowan Gin Rosica Family Foundation Inc · Dunham Fund · Dunham Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sending Support Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sending Support Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sending Support Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sending Support Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sending Support’s filings →

More from the funding graph